000042852 000__ 01150nam\a2200373\i\4500 000042852 001__ 42852 000042852 003__ SzGeWIPO 000042852 005__ 20240708145923.0 000042852 006__ m\\\\eo\\d\\\\\\\\ 000042852 007__ cr bn |||m|||a 000042852 008__ 210323s2020\\\\enk\\\\\o\\\\\000\0\eng\d 000042852 022__ $$aOnline: 2044-7175 000042852 035__ $$a(OCoLC)1255905371 000042852 040__ $$aSzGeWIPO$$beng$$erda$$cSzGeWIPO$$dCaBNVSL 000042852 041__ $$aeng 000042852 24500 $$aTo grant or not to grant :$$bIn the first in a two-part series, Andrew Bowler, Rachel Mumby, Andreas Kramer and Thure Schubert compare England and Germany’s approaches to granting an injunction. 000042852 264_1 $$a[London, England] :$$bInforma Law,$$c2020 000042852 300__ $$a1 online resource (pages 42-44) 000042852 337__ $$acomputer$$2rdamedia 000042852 4901_ $$aIntellectual Property Magazine,$$x2044-7175 ;$$vSept, 2020 000042852 542__ $$fhttps://www.intellectualpropertymagazine.com/patent/to-grant-or-not-to-grant-142954.htm 000042852 588__ $$aCrossref 000042852 590__ $$aPublished online: 19-Aug-20 000042852 650_0 $$aIntellectual property. 000042852 7001_ $$aBowler, Andrew,$$eauthor.$$uBristows. 000042852 7001_ $$aMumby, Rachel,$$eauthor.$$uBristows. 000042852 7001_ $$aSchubert, Thure,$$eauthor.$$uVossius. 000042852 7001_ $$aKramer, Andreas,$$eauthor.$$uVossius. 000042852 7731_ $$tIntellectual Property Magazine$$wIPM 000042852 830_0 $$aIntellectual Property Magazine ;$$vSept, 2020. 000042852 85641 $$uhttps://www.intellectualpropertymagazine.com/patent/to-grant-or-not-to-grant-142954.htm$$yonline version 000042852 904__ $$aJournal article 000042852 980__ $$aIPM