000042687 000__ 00952nam\a2200373\i\4500
000042687 001__ 42687
000042687 003__ SzGeWIPO
000042687 005__ 20240708145917.0
000042687 006__ m\\\\eo\\d\\\\\\\\
000042687 007__ cr bn |||m|||a
000042687 008__ 210309s2020\\\\enk\\\\\\\\\\\000\0\eng\d
000042687 022__ $$a1747-1540 (online)
000042687 0247_ $$a10.1093/jiplp/jpz161$$2doi
000042687 035__ $$a(OCoLC)1248938010
000042687 040__ $$aSzGeWIPO$$beng$$erda$$cSzGeWIPO$$dCaBNVSL
000042687 041__ $$aeng
000042687 24500 $$aGlaxo gets puffed out :$$bUK High Court finds colour purple not distinctive for asthma inhaler.
000042687 264_1 $$a[Oxford, England] :$$bOxford University Press (OUP),$$c2020.
000042687 300__ $$a[4] pages ;$$c[28] cm
000042687 336__ $$atext$$btxt$$2rdacontent
000042687 337__ $$aunmediated$$bn$$2rdamedia
000042687 338__ $$avolume$$bnc$$2rdacarrier
000042687 500__ $$aJournal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 15, 1, 2020, pp. 11-14
000042687 542__ $$fhttps://academic.oup.com/jiplp/article/15/1/11/5671769
000042687 588__ $$aCrossref
000042687 590__ $$aPublished online: 10-Dec-19
000042687 7001_ $$aCameron, Katie,$$eauthor.
000042687 7001_ $$aStrath, Janet,$$eauthor.
000042687 7730_ $$tJournal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice.$$g15, 1, 2020, pp. 11-14,$$x1747-1532$$wjiplp
000042687 85641 $$uhttps://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpz161$$yOnline version
000042687 904__ $$aJournal article
000042687 980__ $$aJIPLP