000042641 000__ 00892nam\a2200361\i\4500
000042641 001__ 42641
000042641 003__ SzGeWIPO
000042641 005__ 20240708145914.0
000042641 006__ m\\\\eo\\d\\\\\\\\
000042641 007__ cr bn |||m|||a
000042641 008__ 210309s2020\\\\enk\\\\\o\\\\\000\0\eng\d
000042641 022__ $$aOnline: 1747-1540
000042641 0247_ $$a10.1093/jiplp/jpaa035$$2doi
000042641 035__ $$a(OCoLC)1255905256
000042641 040__ $$aSzGeWIPO$$beng$$erda$$cSzGeWIPO$$dCaBNVSL
000042641 041__ $$aeng
000042641 24500 $$aUnité de l’art is here to stay—Cofemel and its consequences.
000042641 264_1 $$a[Oxford, England] :$$bOxford University Press (OUP),$$c2020
000042641 300__ $$a1 online resource (pages 290-300)
000042641 337__ $$acomputer$$2rdamedia
000042641 4901_ $$aJournal Of Intellectual Property Law & Practice,$$x1747-1540 ;$$v15, 4, 2020
000042641 542__ $$fhttps://academic.oup.com/jiplp/article/15/4/290/5820998
000042641 588__ $$aCrossref
000042641 590__ $$aPublished online: 16-Apr-20
000042641 650_0 $$aIntellectual property.
000042641 7001_ $$aKur, Annette,$$eauthor.
000042641 7731_ $$tJournal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice$$wjiplp
000042641 830_0 $$aJournal Of Intellectual Property Law & Practice ;$$v15, 4, 2020.
000042641 85641 $$uhttps://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpaa035$$yOnline version
000042641 904__ $$aJournal article
000042641 980__ $$aJIPLP