000042622 000__ 00970nam\a2200361\i\4500
000042622 001__ 42622
000042622 003__ SzGeWIPO
000042622 005__ 20240708145914.0
000042622 006__ m\\\\eo\\d\\\\\\\\
000042622 007__ cr bn |||m|||a
000042622 008__ 210309s2020\\\\enk\\\\\o\\\\\000\0\eng\d
000042622 022__ $$aOnline: 1747-1540
000042622 0247_ $$a10.1093/jiplp/jpaa041$$2doi
000042622 035__ $$a(OCoLC)1255904707
000042622 040__ $$aSzGeWIPO$$beng$$erda$$cSzGeWIPO$$dCaBNVSL
000042622 041__ $$aeng
000042622 24500 $$aDebranding and rebranding of goods: the Mitsubishi decision and the scope of trade mark protection based on function theory.
000042622 264_1 $$a[Oxford, England] :$$bOxford University Press (OUP),$$c2020
000042622 300__ $$a1 online resource (pages 326-331)
000042622 337__ $$acomputer$$2rdamedia
000042622 4901_ $$aJournal Of Intellectual Property Law & Practice,$$x1747-1540 ;$$v15, 5, 2020
000042622 542__ $$fhttps://academic.oup.com/jiplp/article/15/5/326/5824939
000042622 588__ $$aCrossref
000042622 590__ $$aPublished online: 24-Apr-20
000042622 650_0 $$aIntellectual property.
000042622 7001_ $$aStolzenburg-Wiemer, Sandra,$$eauthor.
000042622 7731_ $$tJournal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice$$wjiplp
000042622 830_0 $$aJournal Of Intellectual Property Law & Practice ;$$v15, 5, 2020.
000042622 85641 $$uhttps://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpaa041$$yOnline version
000042622 904__ $$aJournal article
000042622 980__ $$aJIPLP