000042496 000__ 00946nam\a2200361\i\4500
000042496 001__ 42496
000042496 003__ SzGeWIPO
000042496 005__ 20240708145908.0
000042496 006__ m\\\\eo\\d\\\\\\\\
000042496 007__ cr bn |||m|||a
000042496 008__ 210302s2020\\\\enk\\\\\o\\\\\000\0\eng\d
000042496 022__ $$aOnline: 1747-1540
000042496 0247_ $$a10.1093/jiplp/jpaa067$$2doi
000042496 035__ $$a(OCoLC)1255904705
000042496 040__ $$aSzGeWIPO$$beng$$erda$$cSzGeWIPO$$dCaBNVSL
000042496 041__ $$aeng
000042496 24500 $$aPetitions for review of the EPO Appeal Board decisions by the EPO Enlarged Board of Appeal: part IV.
000042496 264_1 $$a[Oxford, England] :$$bOxford University Press (OUP),$$c2020
000042496 300__ $$a1 online resource (pages 691-699)
000042496 337__ $$acomputer$$2rdamedia
000042496 4901_ $$aJournal Of Intellectual Property Law & Practice,$$x1747-1540 ;$$v15, 9, 2020
000042496 542__ $$fhttps://academic.oup.com/jiplp/article-abstract/15/9/691/5837189
000042496 588__ $$aCrossref
000042496 590__ $$aPublished online: 14-May-20
000042496 650_0 $$aIntellectual property.
000042496 7001_ $$aFerrante, Michele,$$eauthor.
000042496 7731_ $$tJournal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice$$wjiplp
000042496 830_0 $$aJournal Of Intellectual Property Law & Practice ;$$v15, 9, 2020.
000042496 85641 $$uhttps://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpaa067$$yOnline version
000042496 904__ $$aJournal article
000042496 980__ $$aJIPLP