000042494 000__ 00990nam\a2200361\i\4500
000042494 001__ 42494
000042494 003__ SzGeWIPO
000042494 005__ 20240708145908.0
000042494 006__ m\\\\eo\\d\\\\\\\\
000042494 007__ cr bn |||m|||a
000042494 008__ 210302s2020\\\\enk\\\\\o\\\\\000\0\eng\d
000042494 022__ $$aOnline: 1747-1540
000042494 0247_ $$a10.1093/jiplp/jpaa132$$2doi
000042494 035__ $$a(OCoLC)1255906081
000042494 040__ $$aSzGeWIPO$$beng$$erda$$cSzGeWIPO$$dCaBNVSL
000042494 041__ $$aeng
000042494 24500 $$aTop of the chops: General Court confirms that differences between designs for wood-splitting tools are insufficient to dispel impression of déjà vu.
000042494 264_1 $$a[Oxford, England] :$$bOxford University Press (OUP),$$c2020
000042494 300__ $$a1 online resource (pages 687-689)
000042494 337__ $$acomputer$$2rdamedia
000042494 4901_ $$aJournal Of Intellectual Property Law & Practice,$$x1747-1540 ;$$v15, 9, 2020
000042494 542__ $$fhttps://academic.oup.com/jiplp/article-abstract/15/9/687/5893002
000042494 588__ $$aCrossref
000042494 590__ $$aPublished online: 16-Aug-20
000042494 650_0 $$aIntellectual property.
000042494 7001_ $$aStrath, Janet,$$eauthor.
000042494 7731_ $$tJournal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice$$wjiplp
000042494 830_0 $$aJournal Of Intellectual Property Law & Practice ;$$v15, 9, 2020.
000042494 85641 $$uhttps://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpaa132$$yOnline version
000042494 904__ $$aJournal article
000042494 980__ $$aJIPLP