000042435 000__ 00952nam\a2200361\i\4500
000042435 001__ 42435
000042435 003__ SzGeWIPO
000042435 005__ 20240708145905.0
000042435 006__ m\\\\eo\\d\\\\\\\\
000042435 007__ cr bn |||m|||a
000042435 008__ 210225s2020\\\\enk\\\\\o\\\\\000\0\eng\d
000042435 022__ $$aOnline: 1747-1540
000042435 0247_ $$a10.1093/jiplp/jpaa138$$2doi
000042435 035__ $$a(OCoLC)1255905783
000042435 040__ $$aSzGeWIPO$$beng$$erda$$cSzGeWIPO$$dCaBNVSL
000042435 041__ $$aeng
000042435 24500 $$aCJEU rules that notion of ‘address’ in the Enforcement Directive is limited to one’s own postal address.
000042435 264_1 $$a[Oxford, England] :$$bOxford University Press (OUP),$$c2020
000042435 300__ $$a1 online resource (pages 779-781)
000042435 337__ $$acomputer$$2rdamedia
000042435 4901_ $$aJournal Of Intellectual Property Law & Practice,$$x1747-1540 ;$$v15, 10, 2020
000042435 542__ $$fhttps://academic.oup.com/jiplp/article-abstract/15/10/779/5903823
000042435 588__ $$aCrossref
000042435 590__ $$aPublished online: 10-Sep-20
000042435 650_0 $$aIntellectual property.
000042435 7001_ $$aRosati, Eleonora,$$eauthor.
000042435 7731_ $$tJournal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice$$wjiplp
000042435 830_0 $$aJournal Of Intellectual Property Law & Practice ;$$v15, 10, 2020.
000042435 85641 $$uhttps://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpaa138$$yOnline version
000042435 904__ $$aJournal article
000042435 980__ $$aJIPLP