000042150 000__ 01443cam\a22002535i\4500
000042150 001__ 42150
000042150 003__ SzGeWIPO
000042150 005__ 20240708145902.0
000042150 008__ 200702s2010\\\\sz\\\\\\r\\\\\000\0\eng\d
000042150 040__ $$aSzGeWIPO$$beng$$erda
000042150 041__ $$aeng
000042150 1001_ $$aBurrell, Robert
000042150 1001_ $$aGangjee, Dev Saif
000042150 24503 $$aTrade Marks and Freedom of Expression :$$bA Call for Caution
000042150 264_1 $$a[St Lucia, Australia] :$$b[The University of Queensland],$$c2010.
000042150 300__ $$a36 pages
000042150 336__ $$atext$$btxt$$2rdacontent
000042150 337__ $$aunmediated$$bn$$2rdamedia
000042150 338__ $$avolume$$bnc$$2rdacarrier
000042150 520__ $$aOver recent years there has been growing interest in the relationship between trade marks and free speech. United States academics have argued that we should look to freedom of expression principles to curb the expansion of trade mark rights and this suggestion is being taken increasingly seriously in other jurisdictions. While sharing concerns about the overreach of trade mark law, we express caution about the advisability of looking to freedom of expression to solve the problem. Specifically, we argue that this focus concedes too much in terms of the reach of trade mark law, is unlikely to prove effective (at least outside of the United States) and carries with it the danger that the relationship between trade marks and speech will become overly simplified.
000042150 525__ $$aPublished in : University of Queensland TC Beirne School of Law Research Paper no. 10-05
000042150 605_0 $$aTrade marks
000042150 650_0 $$aFreedom of expression
000042150 650_0 $$aSpeech
000042150 85641 $$uhttps://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1604886$$yView this resource
000042150 904__ $$aJournal article
000042150 980__ $$aBIB