TY  - GEN
N2  - This Essay does four things. First, it explains why the Shapiro/Lemley article is important, particularly to situate today’s patent holdup debates in the larger context of transaction cost economics. Second, it raises questions related to standards organizations’ rules and antitrust law that the authors could more fully consider. Third, it offers additional support showing the radical nature of Delrahim’s position. And fourth, it opines on the nature of academic debate and its effect on antitrust enforcement.
AB  - This Essay does four things. First, it explains why the Shapiro/Lemley article is important, particularly to situate today’s patent holdup debates in the larger context of transaction cost economics. Second, it raises questions related to standards organizations’ rules and antitrust law that the authors could more fully consider. Third, it offers additional support showing the radical nature of Delrahim’s position. And fourth, it opines on the nature of academic debate and its effect on antitrust enforcement.
T1  - Rescuing Antitrust’s Role in Patent Holdup
AU  - Carrier, Michael A.
LA  - eng
ID  - 42101
KW  - Standards
KW  - Patents
KW  - Antitrust
KW  - Holdup
TI  - Rescuing Antitrust’s Role in Patent Holdup
LK  - https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3625799
UR  - https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3625799
ER  -