000042090 000__ 02449cam\a22002535i\4500
000042090 001__ 42090
000042090 003__ SzGeWIPO
000042090 005__ 20210318105247.0
000042090 008__ 200625s2014\\\\sz\\\\\\r\\\\\000\0\eng\d
000042090 040__ $$aSzGeWIPO$$beng$$erda
000042090 041__ $$aeng
000042090 1001_ $$aSperiusi-Vlad, Alin
000042090 24503 $$aGeneral Guidelines Concerning the Relation International Intellectual Property Business versus Human Rights and Civil Liberties
000042090 264_1 $$a[Oradea, Romania] :$$bUniversity of Oradea,$$c2014.
000042090 300__ $$a1150 pages
000042090 336__ $$atext$$btxt$$2rdacontent
000042090 337__ $$aunmediated$$bn$$2rdamedia
000042090 338__ $$avolume$$bnc$$2rdacarrier
000042090 520__ $$aToday, the intellectual property protection is no longer an absolute social and legal that justifies adoption of any measures necessary to protect it. Initially seen as the prerequisite for sustainable development, implementation of new technologies, and encouragement of international trade, the intellectual property, especially prior to ACTA (Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement) international trial implementation, and also thereafter, was increasingly identified as a source of violation of fundamental rights and civil liberties, i.e. the right to protection of personal data, the right to privacy, freedom to send and receive information freedom of information, freedom to contract, and freedom to carry out economic activities (freedom of commerce). As far as international trade transactions have often a component of intellectual property that requires to be protected, it is necessary to identify the landmarks, the rules establishing de facto limits in order to protect the intellectual property without risk of infringement of fundamental rights and civil liberties of other persons, in particular users or potential users of goods and services incorporating intellectual property. The best guidelines in this regard may be provided by the CJEU (Court of Justice of the European Union) case-law both due to its reasoning underlying the decision of the Parliament to reject ACTA ratification and the fact that the case-law of this Court, especially the most recent one, is highly complex and nuanced, not denying in any way the importance of intellectual property, and identifying certain cases where their primacy persist and whose analysis leads to laying down some general rules in the field.
000042090 525__ $$aPublished in : The Annals of the University of Oradea, no. 1 July 2014, pp. 49-56.
000042090 650__ $$aInternational business
000042090 650_0 $$aIntellectual property
000042090 650_0 $$aHuman rights
000042090 650_0 $$aCivil liberties
000042090 85641 $$uhttps://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2479318$$yView this resource
000042090 904__ $$aArticle
000042090 980__ $$aBIB