000042080 000__ 01626cam\a22002535i\4500
000042080 001__ 42080
000042080 003__ SzGeWIPO
000042080 005__ 20210318105246.0
000042080 008__ 200625s2003\\\\sz\\\\\\r\\\\\000\0\eng\d
000042080 040__ $$aSzGeWIPO$$beng$$erda
000042080 041__ $$aeng
000042080 1001_ $$aHelfer, Laurence R.
000042080 24503 $$aHuman Rights and Intellectual Property :$$bConflict or Coexistence?
000042080 264_1 $$a[Minneapolis, Minnesota] :$$bUniversity of Minnesota Law School,$$c2003.
000042080 300__ $$a16 pages
000042080 336__ $$atext$$btxt$$2rdacontent
000042080 337__ $$aunmediated$$bn$$2rdamedia
000042080 338__ $$avolume$$bnc$$2rdacarrier
000042080 520__ $$a"In this essay, I analyze two competing frameworks that governments, NGOs, and intergovernmental organizations are using to conceptualize the intersection of human rights and intellectual property. The first approach views the two areas of law as in fundamental conflict, with strong intellectual property protection standards - in particular those of the TRIPs Agreement - undermining a broad spectrum of human rights. The second approach sees both areas of law as concerned with the same basic question: defining the appropriate scope of private monopoly power to give authors and inventors a sufficient incentive to create and innovate, while ensuring that the consuming public adequate access to the fruits of their efforts. The essay traces the evolution of these two competing approaches and explores their consequences for future international lawmaking."
000042080 525__ $$aPublished in : Minnesota Journal of Law, Science & Technology, Vol. 5, p. 47, 2003
000042080 650__ $$aHuman rights
000042080 650_0 $$aPatented medicine
000042080 650_0 $$aDigital copyrights
000042080 650_0 $$aTechnology transfers
000042080 650_0 $$aIntellectual property
000042080 650_0 $$aPlant variety protection
000042080 85641 $$uhttps://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=459120$$yView this resource
000042080 904__ $$aArticle
000042080 980__ $$aBIB