\(
\def\WIPO{World Intellectual Property Organisation}
\)
How the Oracle Erred The 'Use/Explanation Distinction' and the Future of Computer Copyright
2017
Formats
| Format | |
|---|---|
| BibTeX | |
| MARCXML | |
| TextMARC | |
| MARC | |
| DataCite | |
| DublinCore | |
| EndNote | |
| NLM | |
| RefWorks | |
| RIS |
Détails
Titre
How the Oracle Erred The 'Use/Explanation Distinction' and the Future of Computer Copyright
Auteur
Type d’élément
Journal article
Description
55 pages
Résumé
This article was written prior to the victory for the ORACLE v GOOGLE defendant based on "fair use". That result does not change the relevance of the earlier copyright decisions of the ORACLE court, which are the topic of my article. Moreover, the late resolution of the copyright claim underlines one of the article's main points, namely, that early dismissal of over-reaching claims of computer copyright infringement is preferable to resolution on the basis of doctrines such as "fair use" which are typically resolved far later in the game.
Note de supplément
Published in : Copyright in an Age of Limitations and Exceptions, Ruth Okediji, Ed., Cambridge University Press (2017)
Ressources liées
Publié
[Cambridge, United Kingdom] : Cambridge University Press, 2017.
Langue
Anglais
Le document apparaît dans