000042063 000__ 01638cam\a22002535i\4500
000042063 001__ 42063
000042063 003__ SzGeWIPO
000042063 005__ 20240708145858.0
000042063 008__ 200625s2020\\\\sz\\\\\\r\\\\\000\0\eng\d
000042063 040__ $$aSzGeWIPO$$beng$$erda
000042063 041__ $$aeng
000042063 1001_ $$aMysoor, Poorna.
000042063 24503 $$aCapturing the Dynamism of Fairness :$$ba Common Law Perspective
000042063 264_1 $$a[Cheltenham, United Kingdom] :$$bEdward Elgar Publishing,$$c2020.
000042063 336__ $$atext$$btxt$$2rdacontent
000042063 337__ $$aunmediated$$bn$$2rdamedia
000042063 338__ $$avolume$$bnc$$2rdacarrier
000042063 520__ $$aStatutory limitations and exceptions are often put forward as the balancing mechanism of copyright law. However, these are steeped in formalism. Although, one might argue that the advantage of formalism is certainty of the law, the value of certainty is diminished if the result of its application is unfair. This chapter argues that the dynamism of fairness is better captured by a court, which can take into account the changing times and circumstances on a case by case basis. Although fair use and fair dealing are normally put forward as less formal approaches to fairness within the regime of statutory limitations and exceptions, this chapter instead deals with the less examined yet facially more open common law power of the judges to prevent or restrict the enforcement of copyright on the grounds of public interest, preserved under s 171(3) of the UK Copyright Designs and Patents Act, 1988.
000042063 525__ $$aPublished in : in Daniel Gervais, Fairness, Morality and Ordre Public in Intellectual Property (Edward Elgar Publishing, 2020) 8-29
000042063 650_0 $$aCopyright
000042063 650_0 $$aFairness
000042063 650_0 $$aFair balance
000042063 650_0 $$aPublic interest defense
000042063 650_0 $$aLimitations and exceptions
000042063 85641 $$uhttps://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3602804$$yView this resource
000042063 904__ $$aJournal article
000042063 980__ $$aBIB