000042043 000__ 01673cam\a22002535i\4500
000042043 001__ 42043
000042043 003__ SzGeWIPO
000042043 005__ 20240708145857.0
000042043 008__ 200624s2019\\\\sz\\\\\\r\\\\\000\0\eng\d
000042043 040__ $$aSzGeWIPO$$beng$$erda
000042043 041__ $$aeng
000042043 1001_ $$aMoerland, Anke
000042043 1001_ $$aPotter, Stephanie De
000042043 24503 $$aCopyright in Street Art and Graffiti in the Netherlands
000042043 264_1 $$a[Cambridge, United Kingdom] :$$bCambridge University Press,$$c2019.
000042043 300__ $$a15 pages
000042043 336__ $$atext$$btxt$$2rdacontent
000042043 337__ $$aunmediated$$bn$$2rdamedia
000042043 338__ $$avolume$$bnc$$2rdacarrier
000042043 520__ $$aThis paper explores to what extent Dutch copyright law protects street and graffiti art, and in particular how Dutch law balances the interests of street artists and property owners. We examine whether street art and graffiti are eligible for copyright protection, in particular tags, throw- ups, graffiti- style letters and more elaborate forms of street art. The moral rights of street artists are discussed in detail, and in particular whether the artists can enforce the attribution or paternity right, for example, when a photographic book includes a picture of an artwork without acknowledgment. We also discuss whether artists can invoke the integrity right to prevent: (a) the destruction of their works, for instance the whitewashing of the mural; and (b) their removal for the purposes of being exhibited and/ or offered for sale in indoor environments. Finally, copyright protection for illegally created street art and graffiti is addressed and whether the paternity and the integrity right of illegally created works can be enforced.
000042043 650_0 $$aIntellectual property
000042043 650_0 $$aGraffiti
000042043 650_0 $$aStreet art
000042043 650_0 $$athe Netherlands
000042043 650_0 $$aProperty rights
000042043 85641 $$uhttps://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3561893$$yView this resource
000042043 904__ $$aJournal article
000042043 980__ $$aBIB