000042035 000__ 01292cam\a22002535i\4500
000042035 001__ 42035
000042035 003__ SzGeWIPO
000042035 005__ 20240708145856.0
000042035 008__ 200624s2011\\\\sz\\\\\\r\\\\\000\0\eng\d
000042035 040__ $$aSzGeWIPO$$beng$$erda
000042035 041__ $$aeng
000042035 1001_ $$aMoore, Adam D.
000042035 1001_ $$aHimma, Kenneth Einar
000042035 24503 $$aIntellectual Property
000042035 264_1 $$a[Stanford, California] :$$bStanford University,$$c2011.
000042035 300__ $$a18 pages
000042035 336__ $$atext$$btxt$$2rdacontent
000042035 337__ $$aunmediated$$bn$$2rdamedia
000042035 338__ $$avolume$$bnc$$2rdacarrier
000042035 520__ $$aLegal protections for intellectual property have a rich history that stretches back to ancient Greece and before. As different legal systems matured in protecting intellectual works, there was a refinement of what was being protected within different areas. Over the same period several strands of moral justification for intellectual property were offered: namely, personality-based, utilitarian, and Lockean. Finally, there have been numerous critics of intellectual property and systems of intellectual property protection. This essay will discuss all of these topics, focusing on Anglo-American and European legal and moral conceptions of intellectual property.
000042035 525__ $$aPublished in : Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Edward N. Zalta
000042035 650_0 $$aCopyright
000042035 650_0 $$aPatent
000042035 650_0 $$aTrade secret
000042035 650_0 $$aIntellectual Property
000042035 85641 $$uhttps://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1980917$$yView this resource
000042035 904__ $$aJournal article
000042035 980__ $$aBIB