000042022 000__ 01663cam\a22002535i\4500
000042022 001__ 42022
000042022 003__ SzGeWIPO
000042022 005__ 20240708145856.0
000042022 008__ 200624s2013\\\\sz\\\\\\r\\\\\000\0\eng\d
000042022 040__ $$aSzGeWIPO$$beng$$erda
000042022 041__ $$aeng
000042022 1001_ $$aHeald, Paul J.
000042022 24503 $$aHow Copyright Keeps Works Disappeared
000042022 264_1 $$a[Champaign, Illinois] :$$bUniversity of Illinois College of Law,$$c2013.
000042022 300__ $$a55 pages
000042022 336__ $$atext$$btxt$$2rdacontent
000042022 337__ $$aunmediated$$bn$$2rdamedia
000042022 338__ $$avolume$$bnc$$2rdacarrier
000042022 520__ $$aA random sample of new books for sale on Amazon.com shows more books for sale from the 1880’s than the 1980’s. Why? This paper presents new data on how copyright stifles the reappearance of works. First, a random sample of more than 2000 new books for sale on Amazon.com is analyzed along with a random sample of almost 2000 songs available on new DVD’s. Copyright status correlates highly with absence from the Amazon shelf. Together with publishing business models, copyright law seems to deter distribution and diminish access. Further analysis of eBook markets, used books on Abebooks.com, and the Chicago Public library collection suggests that no alternative marketplace for out-of-print books has yet developed. Data from iTunes and YouTube, however, tell a different story for older hit songs. The much wider availability of old music in digital form may be explained by the differing holdings in two important cases Boosey & Hawkes v. Disney (music) and Random House v. Rosetta Stone (books).
000042022 525__ $$aPublished in : Illinois Program in Law, Behavior and Social Science Paper, no. LBSS14-07
000042022 650_0 $$aAmazon
000042022 650_0 $$aYoutube
000042022 650_0 $$aPublic domain
000042022 650_0 $$aDMCA
000042022 650_0 $$aSecondary liability
000042022 85641 $$uhttps://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2290181$$yView this resource
000042022 904__ $$aJournal article
000042022 980__ $$aBIB