\(
\def\WIPO{World Intellectual Property Organisation}
\)
Artificial Intelligence as Artist : Why and How U.S. Copyright Law Should Extend to AI
2020
Formats
| Format | |
|---|---|
| BibTeX | |
| MARCXML | |
| TextMARC | |
| MARC | |
| DataCite | |
| DublinCore | |
| EndNote | |
| NLM | |
| RefWorks | |
| RIS |
Détails
Titre
Artificial Intelligence as Artist : Why and How U.S. Copyright Law Should Extend to AI
Auteur
Type d’élément
Journal article
Description
26 pages
ISSN
0736-7694
Résumé
This Note proceeds in four parts. Part I examines the meaning of authorship within the context of copyright law; it explores the current definition of authorship, how that definition continues to evolve, and the distinction between the American understanding of the term “author” compared to the European perspective. Part II discusses the concept of creativity and considers whether non-humans are capable of being creative in the first place. Part III provides a brief historical introduction to the development of AI and demonstrates that such technology is capable of satisfying the requirements necessary for copyright protection. Finally, Part IV proposes a solution for how AI could be regulated if the Copyright Act was amended to include it.
Note de supplément
Published in : Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law, vol. 38, no. 1 (2020)
Ressources liées
Publié
[New York City, New York] : Yeshiva University Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law, 2020.
Langue
Anglais
Le document apparaît dans