TY - GEN N2 - This Note examines the state of print and broadcast journalism, and media in general, in today’s digital market and seeks a solution for both to continue serving the public interest despite mass media conglomeration. Part I of this Note begins with an overview of the constitutional and societal underpinnings of journalism in the United States, looking at the history of journalism, broadcasting, content distribution, and advertising. Part II addresses the shift from traditional journalism to the commercial control exerted on the media in the last decade, through advertising issues brought on by digital innovations in tracking consumer data and new, vertically integrated digital companies entering the competitive space without regulation. Part III discusses the legal analyses conducted by the Department of Justice (DOJ), Federal Trade Commission (FTC), and FCC when confronting merger transactions. Part IV analyzes what must be done differently in determining the criteria for mergers. Consequently, it urges the government to impose restrictions on internet-distribution media companies, rather than to encourage consolidation of preexisting media companies, in order to foster competition among all traditional and “new media” information providers. This Note proposes utilizing disability laws and regulations as an entry point to regulate media companies that are only present in the online space. AB - This Note examines the state of print and broadcast journalism, and media in general, in today’s digital market and seeks a solution for both to continue serving the public interest despite mass media conglomeration. Part I of this Note begins with an overview of the constitutional and societal underpinnings of journalism in the United States, looking at the history of journalism, broadcasting, content distribution, and advertising. Part II addresses the shift from traditional journalism to the commercial control exerted on the media in the last decade, through advertising issues brought on by digital innovations in tracking consumer data and new, vertically integrated digital companies entering the competitive space without regulation. Part III discusses the legal analyses conducted by the Department of Justice (DOJ), Federal Trade Commission (FTC), and FCC when confronting merger transactions. Part IV analyzes what must be done differently in determining the criteria for mergers. Consequently, it urges the government to impose restrictions on internet-distribution media companies, rather than to encourage consolidation of preexisting media companies, in order to foster competition among all traditional and “new media” information providers. This Note proposes utilizing disability laws and regulations as an entry point to regulate media companies that are only present in the online space. T1 - Media in FluxDoes Consolidation Promote the Public Interest? AU - Dvoskin, Simone A. LA - eng ID - 42010 KW - Media KW - Press KW - Journalisme KW - Broadcasting KW - Television SN - 0736-7694 TI - Media in FluxDoes Consolidation Promote the Public Interest? LK - http://www.cardozoaelj.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/DVOSKIN_NOTE.pdf UR - http://www.cardozoaelj.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/DVOSKIN_NOTE.pdf ER -