000042000 000__ 01470cam\a22002535i\4500
000042000 001__ 42000
000042000 003__ SzGeWIPO
000042000 005__ 20240708145855.0
000042000 008__ 200622s2019\\\\sz\\\\\\r\\\\\000\0\eng\d
000042000 022__ $$a0736-7694
000042000 040__ $$aSzGeWIPO$$beng$$erda
000042000 041__ $$aeng
000042000 1001_ $$aBorsack, David B.
000042000 24503 $$aExploration Of The Nfl Franchise Tag Functioning As A Non-compete Clause
000042000 264_1 $$a[New York City, New York] :$$bYeshiva University Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law,$$c2019.
000042000 300__ $$a42 pages
000042000 336__ $$atext$$btxt$$2rdacontent
000042000 337__ $$aunmediated$$bn$$2rdamedia
000042000 338__ $$avolume$$bnc$$2rdacarrier
000042000 520__ $$aThis  Note  explores  the  possibilities  of  modifying,  or eliminating,  the  Franchise  Tag.  Part  I  of  this  Note  will  provide an  in-depth description of the NFL Franchise Tag and its history. Part II will discuss  non-compete  clauses,  specifically  the  factors  that  determine whether a  non-compete  clause  is  enforceable.  Part  III  of  this  Note  will discuss how the Franchise Tag has the practical effect of a non-compete clause  and  why  it  would  be  unenforceable  if  it  were  part  of  a  regular employment  contract.  Part  IV  of  this  Note  presents  two  proposals  for how  to  remedy  the  problems  associated  with  the  Franchise  Tag  in  an attempt  to  satisfy  both  the  owners  and  the  players.
000042000 525__ $$aPublished in : Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law, vol. 37, no. 1 (2019)
000042000 650_0 $$aNational Football League (NFL)
000042000 650_0 $$aFranchise Tag
000042000 650_0 $$aProfessional Football
000042000 85641 $$uhttp://www.cardozoaelj.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/BORSACK_NOTE.pdf$$yView this resource
000042000 904__ $$aJournal article
000042000 980__ $$aBIB