000041996 000__ 01360cam\a22002535i\4500
000041996 001__ 41996
000041996 003__ SzGeWIPO
000041996 005__ 20240708145855.0
000041996 008__ 200622s2019\\\\sz\\\\\\r\\\\\000\0\eng\d
000041996 022__ $$a0736-7694
000041996 040__ $$aSzGeWIPO$$beng$$erda
000041996 041__ $$aeng
000041996 1001_ $$aFarzaneh, Sahara F.
000041996 24503 $$aCultural Appropriation of Traditional Garment Designs in the Post-Star Athletica Era
000041996 264_1 $$a[New York City, New York] :$$bYeshiva University Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law,$$c2019.
000041996 300__ $$a33 pages
000041996 336__ $$atext$$btxt$$2rdacontent
000041996 337__ $$aunmediated$$bn$$2rdamedia
000041996 338__ $$avolume$$bnc$$2rdacarrier
000041996 520__ $$aPart I of this Note analyzes legal avenues commonly employed to protect garment designs prior to Star Athletica. Part II introduces the case, and explains the substantive change it has caused in Copyright Office practices. Part III discusses how the Supreme Court’s decision may influence controversies over cultural appropriation in the fashion industry. This section considers copyright law’s limitations in protecting indigenous garments and analyzes whether—in light of such limitations—disputes that arose prior to Star Athletica would have reached a different outcome today.
000041996 525__ $$aPublished in : Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law, vol. 37, no. 2 (2019)
000041996 650_0 $$aStar Athletica
000041996 650_0 $$aCopyright
000041996 650_0 $$aCopyright protection
000041996 650_0 $$aCultural expressions
000041996 650_0 $$aCultural appropriation
000041996 85641 $$uhttp://www.cardozoaelj.com/issues/archive/2018-19-archive-volume-37/$$yView this resource
000041996 904__ $$aJournal article
000041996 980__ $$aBIB