TY  - GEN
AB  - Part I of this Note analyzes legal avenues commonly employed to protect garment designs prior to Star Athletica. Part II introduces the case, and explains the substantive change it has caused in Copyright Office practices. Part III discusses how the Supreme Court’s decision may influence controversies over cultural appropriation in the fashion industry. This section considers copyright law’s limitations in protecting indigenous garments and analyzes whether—in light of such limitations—disputes that arose prior to Star Athletica would have reached a different outcome today.
AU  - Farzaneh, Sahara F.
ID  - 41996
KW  - Star Athletica
KW  - Copyright
KW  - Copyright protection
KW  - Cultural expressions
KW  - Cultural appropriation
LA  - eng
LK  - http://www.cardozoaelj.com/issues/archive/2018-19-archive-volume-37/
N2  - Part I of this Note analyzes legal avenues commonly employed to protect garment designs prior to Star Athletica. Part II introduces the case, and explains the substantive change it has caused in Copyright Office practices. Part III discusses how the Supreme Court’s decision may influence controversies over cultural appropriation in the fashion industry. This section considers copyright law’s limitations in protecting indigenous garments and analyzes whether—in light of such limitations—disputes that arose prior to Star Athletica would have reached a different outcome today.
SN  - 0736-7694
T1  - Cultural Appropriation of Traditional Garment Designs in the Post-Star Athletica Era
TI  - Cultural Appropriation of Traditional Garment Designs in the Post-Star Athletica Era
UR  - http://www.cardozoaelj.com/issues/archive/2018-19-archive-volume-37/
ER  -