TY - GEN N2 - This Note begins by briefly surveying the Fourth Amendment’s application in landmark modern-era Supreme Court cases and the accompanying issue of what constitutes a reasonable expectation of privacy. Next, Section I.C. introduces the “third-party doctrine” which states, in brief, that there is no Fourth Amendment interest in information knowingly and voluntarily revealed to “third parties.” Section I.D.will introduce the state-action doctrine. Section II examines whether the New York City government’s actions in hiring CityBridge to administer the LinkNYC program were sufficientto implicate the state-action doctrine and trigger the Fourth Amendment’s protections. Section III examines whether the LinkNYC Program implicates the third-party doctrine. AB - This Note begins by briefly surveying the Fourth Amendment’s application in landmark modern-era Supreme Court cases and the accompanying issue of what constitutes a reasonable expectation of privacy. Next, Section I.C. introduces the “third-party doctrine” which states, in brief, that there is no Fourth Amendment interest in information knowingly and voluntarily revealed to “third parties.” Section I.D.will introduce the state-action doctrine. Section II examines whether the New York City government’s actions in hiring CityBridge to administer the LinkNYC program were sufficientto implicate the state-action doctrine and trigger the Fourth Amendment’s protections. Section III examines whether the LinkNYC Program implicates the third-party doctrine. T1 - Municipal WI-FI and the Third-Party Doctrine :Rethinking an Antiquated Framework AU - Forrest, David A. LA - eng ID - 41985 KW - Privacy KW - LinkNYC SN - 0736-7694 TI - Municipal WI-FI and the Third-Party Doctrine :Rethinking an Antiquated Framework LK - http://www.cardozoaelj.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/FORREST_NOTE.pdf UR - http://www.cardozoaelj.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/FORREST_NOTE.pdf ER -