000041981 000__ 01111cam\a22002535i\4500
000041981 001__ 41981
000041981 003__ SzGeWIPO
000041981 005__ 20240708145854.0
000041981 008__ 200622s2017\\\\sz\\\\\\r\\\\\000\0\eng\d
000041981 022__ $$a0736-7694
000041981 040__ $$aSzGeWIPO$$beng$$erda
000041981 041__ $$aeng
000041981 1001_ $$aKaplun, Alyssa
000041981 24503 $$aScratching the Seven-Year Itch$$bA Call to Reform California Labor Code Section 2855(b)
000041981 264_1 $$a[New York City, New York] :$$bYeshiva University Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law,$$c2017.
000041981 300__ $$a29 pages
000041981 336__ $$atext$$btxt$$2rdacontent
000041981 337__ $$aunmediated$$bn$$2rdamedia
000041981 338__ $$avolume$$bnc$$2rdacarrier
000041981 520__ $$aThis Note will argue why the  standard  implemented  by  Federal  Circuit  is  flawed  through  an  economic  analysis  and  comparison  of  design  patents  versus  utility  patents  before  and  after  the  decision  in  Apple  v.  Samsung.  This  Note  will then propose a more functional and fair design patent infringement remedy standard based on “apportionment.”
000041981 525__ $$aPublished in : Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law, vol. 35, no. 1 (2017)
000041981 650_0 $$aMusic industry
000041981 650_0 $$aMusic streaming
000041981 650_0 $$aRecording industry
000041981 650_0 $$aRecord label
000041981 85641 $$uhttp://www.cardozoaelj.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/35.1-Kaplun.pdf$$yView this resource
000041981 904__ $$aJournal article
000041981 980__ $$aBIB