000041944 000__ 01511cam\a22002535i\4500
000041944 001__ 41944
000041944 003__ SzGeWIPO
000041944 005__ 20240708145853.0
000041944 008__ 200619s2019\\\\sz\\\\\\r\\\\\000\0\eng\d
000041944 022__ $$a0736-7694
000041944 040__ $$aSzGeWIPO$$beng$$erda
000041944 041__ $$aeng
000041944 1001_ $$aMorris, Sean P.
000041944 24503 $$aFrom Territorial To Universal :$$bthe Extraterritoriality of Trademark Law and the Privatizing of International Law
000041944 264_1 $$a[New York City, New York] :$$bYeshiva University Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law,$$c2019.
000041944 300__ $$a53 pages
000041944 336__ $$atext$$btxt$$2rdacontent
000041944 337__ $$aunmediated$$bn$$2rdamedia
000041944 338__ $$avolume$$bnc$$2rdacarrier
000041944 520__ $$aLegal doctrines, aided and abetted by interpretations of the courts, carry  the  force  of  law.  The  implication  is  that  when courts  settle matters, they often go beyond the scope of current intellectual property legislation.  Furthermore,  global  problems  in  intellectual  property  may require  the  participation  of  private  intellectual  property  rights  owners to  bring  suit.  This,  in  turn,  often  creates  more  problems  due  to  the territorial,   trans-territorial,   and   extraterritorial   reach   of   the   law, especially  with  respect  private  trademark  rights.  I  explore  this  and other  legal  conundrums  in  this  Article.  The  key  concern  addressed  in the Article is how far trademark law is privatizing international law.
000041944 525__ $$aPublished in : Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law, vol. 37, no. 1
000041944 650_0 $$aTrademark law
000041944 650_0 $$aInternational law
000041944 650_0 $$aPrivatization
000041944 85641 $$uhttp://www.cardozoaelj.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/MORRIS_ARTICLE.pdf$$yView this resource
000041944 904__ $$aJournal article
000041944 980__ $$aBIB