000041942 000__ 02280cam\a22002535i\4500 000041942 001__ 41942 000041942 003__ SzGeWIPO 000041942 005__ 20240708145852.0 000041942 008__ 200619s2018\\\\sz\\\\\\r\\\\\000\0\eng\d 000041942 022__ $$a0736-7694 000041942 040__ $$aSzGeWIPO$$beng$$erda 000041942 041__ $$aeng 000041942 1001_ $$aVats, Anjali 000041942 1001_ $$aKeller, Deidré A. 000041942 24503 $$aCritical Race IP 000041942 264_1 $$a[New York City, New York] :$$bYeshiva University Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law,$$c2018. 000041942 300__ $$a61 pages 000041942 336__ $$atext$$btxt$$2rdacontent 000041942 337__ $$aunmediated$$bn$$2rdamedia 000041942 338__ $$avolume$$bnc$$2rdacarrier 000041942 520__ $$aIn this Article, written on the heels of Race + IP 2017, a conference we co-organized with Amit Basole and Jessica Silbey, we propose and articulate a theoretical framework for an interdisciplinary movement that we call Critical Race Intellectual Property (Critical Race IP). Specifically, we argue that given trends toward maximalist intellectual property policy, it is now more important than ever to study the racial investments and implications of the laws of copyright, trademark, patent, right of publicity, trade secret, and unfair competition in a manner that draws upon Critical Race Theory (CRT). Situating our argument in a historical context, we articulate the provisional boundaries and core ideological commitments that define Critical Race IP, particularly in contrast with Critical Intellectual Property. After exploring the landscape of this developing area of study through its central themes, we draw upon scholarship on public feelings to demonstrate the importance of community building and intimacy-making practices in the growth of Critical Race IP. Public feelings are an implicit and often under-theorized aspect of intellectual property law that comes to the forefront in engagements with race and colonialism. We conclude with a discussion of Critical Race IP as decolonizing praxis that can aid in anti-racist and anti-colonial struggles. 000041942 525__ $$aPublished in : Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law, vol. 36, no. 3 000041942 650_0 $$aIntellectual property economy 000041942 650_0 $$aTraditional knowledge 000041942 650_0 $$aPiracy 000041942 650_0 $$aAccess to knowledge 000041942 650_0 $$aProprietary models 000041942 650_0 $$aCritical Race Theory (CRT) 000041942 85641 $$uhttp://www.cardozoaelj.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/VATS-KELLER-ARTICLE.pdf$$yView this resource 000041942 904__ $$aJournal article 000041942 980__ $$aBIB