000041935 000__ 01698cam\a22002535i\4500
000041935 001__ 41935
000041935 003__ SzGeWIPO
000041935 005__ 20240708145852.0
000041935 008__ 200619s2018\\\\sz\\\\\\r\\\\\000\0\eng\d
000041935 022__ $$a0736-7694
000041935 040__ $$aSzGeWIPO$$beng$$erda
000041935 041__ $$aeng
000041935 1001_ $$aShipley, David E.
000041935 24503 $$aAll for Copyright Stand Up and Holler! Three Cheers for Star Athletica and the U.S. Supreme Court's Perceived and Imagined Separately Test
000041935 264_1 $$a[New York City, New York] :$$bYeshiva University Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law,$$c2018.
000041935 300__ $$a22 pages
000041935 336__ $$atext$$btxt$$2rdacontent
000041935 337__ $$aunmediated$$bn$$2rdamedia
000041935 338__ $$avolume$$bnc$$2rdacarrier
000041935 520__ $$aThis article  discusses  the  potential  impact  of  the Star  Athletica decision and the Court’s new two-part  test  for  separability.  The  first section  summarizes  how  product  shape  and  design  are  protected  under our intellectual property laws, explains the preference for copyright, and sets  forth  federal  policy  allowing  the  public  to  copy  products  that  our patent and copyright laws leave in the public domain. It next provides an  overview  of  how  copyright  protection  for  the  artistic  features incorporated  in  useful  articles evolved between the Supreme Court’s 1954  decision  in Mazer  v.  Stein and  its  decision  in Star  Athletica in 2017. After   summarizing   the   majority,   concurring,   and   dissenting opinions  in Star  Athletica, the  article  applies  the  new  test  in  several difficult pre-Star Athletica cases in order assess the decision’s practical impact on a variety of useful articles.
000041935 525__ $$aPublished in : Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law, vol. 36, no. 1
000041935 650_0 $$aStar Athletica
000041935 650_0 $$aCopyright protection
000041935 85641 $$uhttp://www.cardozoaelj.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/SHIPLEY_ARTICLE.pdf$$yView this resource
000041935 904__ $$aJournal article
000041935 980__ $$aBIB