000041847 000__ 02414cam\a22002535i\4500
000041847 001__ 41847
000041847 003__ SzGeWIPO
000041847 005__ 20240708145801.0
000041847 008__ 200616s2020\\\\sz\\\\\\r\\\\\000\0\eng\d
000041847 022__ $$a2589-2975
000041847 040__ $$aSzGeWIPO$$beng$$erda
000041847 041__ $$aeng
000041847 1001_ $$aBai, Ou
000041847 1001_ $$aWei, Jiang
000041847 1001_ $$aYang,  Xiaohua
000041847 1001_ $$aChen,  Roger (Rongxin)
000041847 24503 $$aThird-party relational governance and collaborative innovation performance :$$bThe role of IPR protection
000041847 264_1 $$aBeijing, China :$$bKeAi Communications,$$c2020.
000041847 300__ $$a15 pages
000041847 336__ $$atext$$btxt$$2rdacontent
000041847 337__ $$aunmediated$$bn$$2rdamedia
000041847 338__ $$avolume$$bnc$$2rdacarrier
000041847 500__ $$aThis resource was extracted from the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
000041847 520__ $$aThe purpose of this study is to explore the impact of third-party relational governance on the performance of collaborative innovation in China. By integrating the relational view and innovation appropriation perspectives, this study analyses the effects of three mechanisms of third-party relational governance—co-reputation, interorganizational routines, and technological norms—on collaborative innovation performance. Additionally, this study investigates the moderating effects of the protection of intellectual Property Rights (IPR) on the relationship between third-party relational governance and collaborative innovation performance. Survey data of high-technology firms in China are used to empirically test the hypotheses. The results show that third-party relational governance has a positive effect on collaborative innovation performance and that IPR protection has different moderating effects. This study contributes to the relational governance literature by adding the perspective of third parties and analyzing three mechanisms of third-party relational governance in a single model. This study also contributes to the innovation appropriation literature by examining the role of IPR protection in governing collaborative innovation in China. Finally, this study offers suggestions on how Chinese firms should govern their collaborative innovation to remedy the limitations of a weak IPR legal institutional framework.
000041847 525__ $$aPublished in : International Journal of Innovation Studies, vol. 4, no. 1 (2020), pp. 1-15.
000041847 650_0 $$aSocial sciences$$xCommerce$$xBusiness
000041847 650_0 $$aThird-party relational governance
000041847 650_0 $$aCollaborative innovation
000041847 650_0 $$aIPR protection
000041847 650_0 $$aChinese high-technology industry
000041847 85641 $$uhttps://doaj.org/article/a51969faf95a4977a3a38d6bc651bd39$$yView this resource
000041847 904__ $$aJournal article
000041847 980__ $$aBIB