Volume I
Introduction
Part I: Introduction: The Concept of Innovation and The Role of Law
1. On the Complex Economics of Patent Scope’, Columbia Law Review, 90 (4), May, 839–916; 2. Innovation and Institutions: Rethinking the Economics of U.S. Science and Technology Policy’, Vermont Law Review, 24, Fall, 347–416: 3. Robert Cooter (2005), ‘Innovation, Information, and the Poverty of Nations’, Florida State University Law Review, 33 (2), Winter, 373–93; 4. Contract and Innovation: The Limited Role of Generalist Courts in the Evolution of Novel Contractual Forms’, New York University Law Review, 88 (3), April, 170–215; 5. Evolving Innovation Paradigms and the Global Intellectual Property Regime’, Connecticut Law Review, 41 (3), February, 861–920
Part II: Incentives, Law and Innovation
6. Amy L. Landers (2006), ‘Let the Games Begin: Incentives to Innovation in the New Economy of Intellectual Property Law’, Santa Clara Law Review, 46 (2), 307–75; 7. Beyond Schumpeter vs. Arrow: How Antitrust Fosters Innovation’, Antitrust Law Journal, 74 (3), 575–602; . Knowledge, Competition and Innovation: Is Strong IPR Protection Really Needed for More and Better Innovations?’, Michigan Telecommunications and Technology Law Review, 13 (2), Spring, 471–85; 9. Innovation without Patents: Evidence from World’s Fairs’, Journal of Law and Economics, 55 (1), February, 43–74; 10. Copyright-Innovation Tradeoff: Property Rules, Liability Rules, and Intentional Infliction of Harm’, Stanford Law Review, 64 (4), April, 951–1020; 11. Commercializing Patents’, Stanford Law Review, 62 (2), January, 341–413: 12. Putting Innovation Incentives Back in the Patent-Antitrust Interface’, Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property, 11 (5), April, 385–439; 13. Less Protection, More Innovation?’, Supreme Court Economic Review, 22 (1), January, 123–46; 14. Patentable Subject Matter and Nonpatent Innovation Incentives’, UC Irvine Law Review, 5 (5), December, 1115–45
Part III: Cumulative and Open Innovation
15. Patents and Cumulative Innovation’, Washington University Journal of Law and Policy, Re-Engineering Patent Law: The Challenge of New Technologies, 2, January, 229–46; 16. Policy Challenges of Open, Cumulative, and User Innovation’, Washington University Journal of Law and Policy: Open Source and Proprietary Models of Innovation, 30, 17–41; 17. The Collaborative Nature of Innovation’, Washington University Journal of Law and Policy: Open Source and Proprietary Models of Innovation, 30, 293–324; 18. Open Innovation in Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture’, Chicago-Kent Journal of Intellectual Property, 13 (1), 11–50; 19. Enabling Patentless Innovation’, Maryland Law Review, 74 (3), 431–95
Volume II
Introduction An introduction to both volumes by the editor appears in Volume I
Part I: Social Dimensions of Innovation
1. Crossing the Innovation Divide’, Temple Law Review, 81 (2), Summer, 507–43: 2. Altruism and Innovation in Healthcare’, Journal of Law and Economics, 53 (3), August, 497–518; 3. Social Innovation’, Washington University Law Review, 92 (1), 1–71; 4. Does Sharing Mean Caring? Regulating Innovation in the Sharing Economy’, Minnesota Journal of Law, Science and Technology, 16 (1), 413–75
Part II: Innovation and Markets; 5. Promoting Innovation Competition through the Aspen/Kodak Rule’, George Mason Law Review, 7 (3), Spring, 495–521; 6. Intellectual Property, Innovation, and Decentralized Decisions’, Virginia Law Review, 92 (1), March, 123–47; 7. Guarding Profits from Innovation: Successful Intellectual Property Strategies’, DePaul Business and Commercial Law Journal, 6 (3), Spring, 433–50; 8. Property as Process: How Innovation Markets Select Innovation Regimes’, Yale Law Journal, 119 (3), December, 384–456; 9. The Open Source Paradox: Innovation in the Absence of Exclusive Property Rights’, Competition Law International, 7 (2), November, 38–41; 10. Fostering the Business of Innovation: The Untold Story of Bowers v. Baystate Technologies’, Washington Journal of Law, Technology and Arts, 7 (4), Spring, 445–66; 11. Copyright and Innovation: The Untold Story’, Wisconsin Law Review, 2012 (4), November, 891–962; 12. Startups and Patent Trolls’, Stanford Technology Law Review, 17 (2), Winter, 461–505
Part III: Innovation Policy
13. Should Prizes Replace Patents? A Critique of the Medical Innovation Prize Act of 2005’, Boston University Journal of Science and Technology Law, 13 (1), Winter, 25–45; 14. Transferring Innovation’, Fordham Law Review, 77 (5), April, 2169–223; 15. In the Shadow of Innovation’, Cardozo Law Review, 31 (6), June, 2257–312; 16. Prioritizing Innovation’, Wisconsin International Law Journal, 30 (3), Spring, 499–557; 17. The Strategic Use of Public Procurement in Support of Innovation’, European Procurement and Public Private Partnership Law Review, 9 (1), 3–11; 18. Nanotechnology and Innovation Policy’, Harvard Journal of Law and Technology, 29 (1), Fall, 33–75; 19. Commercialization Awards’, Wisconsin Law Review, 2015 (1), 13–86; 20. The Privacy-Innovation Conundrum’, Lewis and Clark Law Review, 19 (1), 115–68
Index