\(
\def\WIPO{World Intellectual Property Organisation}
\)
Intellectual Property and Innovation
2017
Details
Title
Intellectual Property and Innovation
Author
Imprint
Cheltenham, UK : Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, 2017.
Item Type
Book
Description
1 online resource (p.) ; cm.
ISBN
9781785366253 Print
9781785366260 eBook
9781785366260 eBook
Summary
This illuminating two-volume collection presents leading articles on the theory and practice of intellectual property law as it applies to the promotion of innovation in economic, social, and legal dimensions. Topics include the role of law and incentives, cumulative and open forms of innovation, as well as discussion of its social dimensions, relationship with market institutions and how to chart a course for future innovation policy. Together with an original introduction by the editor, this collection offers a compelling overview of the ideas that ignite and enliven innovation scholarship, invaluable to academics and policymakers alike.
Formatted Contents Note
Volume I
Introduction
Part I: Introduction: The Concept of Innovation and The Role of Law
1. On the Complex Economics of Patent Scope’, Columbia Law Review, 90 (4), May, 839–916; 2. Innovation and Institutions: Rethinking the Economics of U.S. Science and Technology Policy’, Vermont Law Review, 24, Fall, 347–416: 3. Robert Cooter (2005), ‘Innovation, Information, and the Poverty of Nations’, Florida State University Law Review, 33 (2), Winter, 373–93; 4. Contract and Innovation: The Limited Role of Generalist Courts in the Evolution of Novel Contractual Forms’, New York University Law Review, 88 (3), April, 170–215; 5. Evolving Innovation Paradigms and the Global Intellectual Property Regime’, Connecticut Law Review, 41 (3), February, 861–920
Part II: Incentives, Law and Innovation
6. Amy L. Landers (2006), ‘Let the Games Begin: Incentives to Innovation in the New Economy of Intellectual Property Law’, Santa Clara Law Review, 46 (2), 307–75; 7. Beyond Schumpeter vs. Arrow: How Antitrust Fosters Innovation’, Antitrust Law Journal, 74 (3), 575–602; . Knowledge, Competition and Innovation: Is Strong IPR Protection Really Needed for More and Better Innovations?’, Michigan Telecommunications and Technology Law Review, 13 (2), Spring, 471–85; 9. Innovation without Patents: Evidence from World’s Fairs’, Journal of Law and Economics, 55 (1), February, 43–74; 10. Copyright-Innovation Tradeoff: Property Rules, Liability Rules, and Intentional Infliction of Harm’, Stanford Law Review, 64 (4), April, 951–1020; 11. Commercializing Patents’, Stanford Law Review, 62 (2), January, 341–413: 12. Putting Innovation Incentives Back in the Patent-Antitrust Interface’, Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property, 11 (5), April, 385–439; 13. Less Protection, More Innovation?’, Supreme Court Economic Review, 22 (1), January, 123–46; 14. Patentable Subject Matter and Nonpatent Innovation Incentives’, UC Irvine Law Review, 5 (5), December, 1115–45
Part III: Cumulative and Open Innovation
15. Patents and Cumulative Innovation’, Washington University Journal of Law and Policy, Re-Engineering Patent Law: The Challenge of New Technologies, 2, January, 229–46; 16. Policy Challenges of Open, Cumulative, and User Innovation’, Washington University Journal of Law and Policy: Open Source and Proprietary Models of Innovation, 30, 17–41; 17. The Collaborative Nature of Innovation’, Washington University Journal of Law and Policy: Open Source and Proprietary Models of Innovation, 30, 293–324; 18. Open Innovation in Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture’, Chicago-Kent Journal of Intellectual Property, 13 (1), 11–50; 19. Enabling Patentless Innovation’, Maryland Law Review, 74 (3), 431–95
Volume II
Introduction An introduction to both volumes by the editor appears in Volume I
Part I: Social Dimensions of Innovation
1. Crossing the Innovation Divide’, Temple Law Review, 81 (2), Summer, 507–43: 2. Altruism and Innovation in Healthcare’, Journal of Law and Economics, 53 (3), August, 497–518; 3. Social Innovation’, Washington University Law Review, 92 (1), 1–71; 4. Does Sharing Mean Caring? Regulating Innovation in the Sharing Economy’, Minnesota Journal of Law, Science and Technology, 16 (1), 413–75
Part II: Innovation and Markets; 5. Promoting Innovation Competition through the Aspen/Kodak Rule’, George Mason Law Review, 7 (3), Spring, 495–521; 6. Intellectual Property, Innovation, and Decentralized Decisions’, Virginia Law Review, 92 (1), March, 123–47; 7. Guarding Profits from Innovation: Successful Intellectual Property Strategies’, DePaul Business and Commercial Law Journal, 6 (3), Spring, 433–50; 8. Property as Process: How Innovation Markets Select Innovation Regimes’, Yale Law Journal, 119 (3), December, 384–456; 9. The Open Source Paradox: Innovation in the Absence of Exclusive Property Rights’, Competition Law International, 7 (2), November, 38–41; 10. Fostering the Business of Innovation: The Untold Story of Bowers v. Baystate Technologies’, Washington Journal of Law, Technology and Arts, 7 (4), Spring, 445–66; 11. Copyright and Innovation: The Untold Story’, Wisconsin Law Review, 2012 (4), November, 891–962; 12. Startups and Patent Trolls’, Stanford Technology Law Review, 17 (2), Winter, 461–505
Part III: Innovation Policy
13. Should Prizes Replace Patents? A Critique of the Medical Innovation Prize Act of 2005’, Boston University Journal of Science and Technology Law, 13 (1), Winter, 25–45; 14. Transferring Innovation’, Fordham Law Review, 77 (5), April, 2169–223; 15. In the Shadow of Innovation’, Cardozo Law Review, 31 (6), June, 2257–312; 16. Prioritizing Innovation’, Wisconsin International Law Journal, 30 (3), Spring, 499–557; 17. The Strategic Use of Public Procurement in Support of Innovation’, European Procurement and Public Private Partnership Law Review, 9 (1), 3–11; 18. Nanotechnology and Innovation Policy’, Harvard Journal of Law and Technology, 29 (1), Fall, 33–75; 19. Commercialization Awards’, Wisconsin Law Review, 2015 (1), 13–86; 20. The Privacy-Innovation Conundrum’, Lewis and Clark Law Review, 19 (1), 115–68
Index
Introduction
Part I: Introduction: The Concept of Innovation and The Role of Law
1. On the Complex Economics of Patent Scope’, Columbia Law Review, 90 (4), May, 839–916; 2. Innovation and Institutions: Rethinking the Economics of U.S. Science and Technology Policy’, Vermont Law Review, 24, Fall, 347–416: 3. Robert Cooter (2005), ‘Innovation, Information, and the Poverty of Nations’, Florida State University Law Review, 33 (2), Winter, 373–93; 4. Contract and Innovation: The Limited Role of Generalist Courts in the Evolution of Novel Contractual Forms’, New York University Law Review, 88 (3), April, 170–215; 5. Evolving Innovation Paradigms and the Global Intellectual Property Regime’, Connecticut Law Review, 41 (3), February, 861–920
Part II: Incentives, Law and Innovation
6. Amy L. Landers (2006), ‘Let the Games Begin: Incentives to Innovation in the New Economy of Intellectual Property Law’, Santa Clara Law Review, 46 (2), 307–75; 7. Beyond Schumpeter vs. Arrow: How Antitrust Fosters Innovation’, Antitrust Law Journal, 74 (3), 575–602; . Knowledge, Competition and Innovation: Is Strong IPR Protection Really Needed for More and Better Innovations?’, Michigan Telecommunications and Technology Law Review, 13 (2), Spring, 471–85; 9. Innovation without Patents: Evidence from World’s Fairs’, Journal of Law and Economics, 55 (1), February, 43–74; 10. Copyright-Innovation Tradeoff: Property Rules, Liability Rules, and Intentional Infliction of Harm’, Stanford Law Review, 64 (4), April, 951–1020; 11. Commercializing Patents’, Stanford Law Review, 62 (2), January, 341–413: 12. Putting Innovation Incentives Back in the Patent-Antitrust Interface’, Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property, 11 (5), April, 385–439; 13. Less Protection, More Innovation?’, Supreme Court Economic Review, 22 (1), January, 123–46; 14. Patentable Subject Matter and Nonpatent Innovation Incentives’, UC Irvine Law Review, 5 (5), December, 1115–45
Part III: Cumulative and Open Innovation
15. Patents and Cumulative Innovation’, Washington University Journal of Law and Policy, Re-Engineering Patent Law: The Challenge of New Technologies, 2, January, 229–46; 16. Policy Challenges of Open, Cumulative, and User Innovation’, Washington University Journal of Law and Policy: Open Source and Proprietary Models of Innovation, 30, 17–41; 17. The Collaborative Nature of Innovation’, Washington University Journal of Law and Policy: Open Source and Proprietary Models of Innovation, 30, 293–324; 18. Open Innovation in Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture’, Chicago-Kent Journal of Intellectual Property, 13 (1), 11–50; 19. Enabling Patentless Innovation’, Maryland Law Review, 74 (3), 431–95
Volume II
Introduction An introduction to both volumes by the editor appears in Volume I
Part I: Social Dimensions of Innovation
1. Crossing the Innovation Divide’, Temple Law Review, 81 (2), Summer, 507–43: 2. Altruism and Innovation in Healthcare’, Journal of Law and Economics, 53 (3), August, 497–518; 3. Social Innovation’, Washington University Law Review, 92 (1), 1–71; 4. Does Sharing Mean Caring? Regulating Innovation in the Sharing Economy’, Minnesota Journal of Law, Science and Technology, 16 (1), 413–75
Part II: Innovation and Markets; 5. Promoting Innovation Competition through the Aspen/Kodak Rule’, George Mason Law Review, 7 (3), Spring, 495–521; 6. Intellectual Property, Innovation, and Decentralized Decisions’, Virginia Law Review, 92 (1), March, 123–47; 7. Guarding Profits from Innovation: Successful Intellectual Property Strategies’, DePaul Business and Commercial Law Journal, 6 (3), Spring, 433–50; 8. Property as Process: How Innovation Markets Select Innovation Regimes’, Yale Law Journal, 119 (3), December, 384–456; 9. The Open Source Paradox: Innovation in the Absence of Exclusive Property Rights’, Competition Law International, 7 (2), November, 38–41; 10. Fostering the Business of Innovation: The Untold Story of Bowers v. Baystate Technologies’, Washington Journal of Law, Technology and Arts, 7 (4), Spring, 445–66; 11. Copyright and Innovation: The Untold Story’, Wisconsin Law Review, 2012 (4), November, 891–962; 12. Startups and Patent Trolls’, Stanford Technology Law Review, 17 (2), Winter, 461–505
Part III: Innovation Policy
13. Should Prizes Replace Patents? A Critique of the Medical Innovation Prize Act of 2005’, Boston University Journal of Science and Technology Law, 13 (1), Winter, 25–45; 14. Transferring Innovation’, Fordham Law Review, 77 (5), April, 2169–223; 15. In the Shadow of Innovation’, Cardozo Law Review, 31 (6), June, 2257–312; 16. Prioritizing Innovation’, Wisconsin International Law Journal, 30 (3), Spring, 499–557; 17. The Strategic Use of Public Procurement in Support of Innovation’, European Procurement and Public Private Partnership Law Review, 9 (1), 3–11; 18. Nanotechnology and Innovation Policy’, Harvard Journal of Law and Technology, 29 (1), Fall, 33–75; 19. Commercialization Awards’, Wisconsin Law Review, 2015 (1), 13–86; 20. The Privacy-Innovation Conundrum’, Lewis and Clark Law Review, 19 (1), 115–68
Index
Language
English
Record Appears in