000040525 000__ 00965nmm\a2200253Ia\4500
000040525 001__ 40525
000040525 005__ 20240708145803.0
000040525 008__ 200108s2019\\\\xx\\\\\\\\\\\\000\0\eng\d
000040525 022__ $$aOnline: 1747-1540
000040525 022__ $$aPrint: 1747-1532
000040525 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1093/jiplp/jpz088
000040525 035__ $$aJIPLP/art/jpz088
000040525 041__ $$aeng
000040525 245__ $$aCJEU excludes retroactive application of reformed language of Article 7(1)(e)(iii) of the EU Trade Mark Regulation and does (not) clarify what ‘another characteristic’ means
000040525 260__ $$aOxford University Press (OUP)$$c2019
000040525 300__ $$aJournal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice,$$b14,$$b8,$$b2019,$$bpp. 590-592
000040525 520__ $$aCJEU, Textilis Ltd and Ozgur Keskin v Svenskt Tenn Aktiebolag, C-21/18, EU:C:2019:199, 14 March 2019
000040525 542__ $$fhttps://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model
000040525 588__ $$aCrossref
000040525 590__ $$aPublished online: 21-Feb-18
000040525 710__ $$aEleonora Rosati Stockholm University and Bird & Bird
000040525 773__ $$tJournal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice$$wjiplp
000040525 85641 $$uhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpz088$$yOnline version
000040525 904__ $$aJournal article
000040525 980__ $$aJIPLP