000026019 000__ 01696cam\a2200421\i\4500
000026019 001__ 26019
000026019 003__ SzGeWIPO
000026019 005__ 20240708162341.0
000026019 008__ 100617s2009    xx |||||r|||| 00| 0 por d
000026019 035__ $$a(wipo)0
000026019 035__ $$a(OCoLC)1159946261
000026019 040__ $$aSzGeWIPO$$beng$$erda$$cSzGeWIPO$$dCaBNVSL
000026019 043__ $$aa-cc---
000026019 050_4 $$aK1565$$b.W674
000026019 08204 $$a346.048805$$222
000026019 084__ $$aGB 100 
000026019 1001_ $$aChan, G.,$$eauthor.
000026019 24513 $$aAn insight into China's top trademark cases /$$cChan, G., Smith, T., Hao, L.
000026019 264_1 $$a[Place of publication not identified] :$$b[publisher not identified],$$c2009.
000026019 300__ $$a1 volume ([4] pages) ;$$c[28] cm.
000026019 336__ $$atext$$btxt$$2rdacontent
000026019 337__ $$aunmediated$$bn$$2rdamedia
000026019 338__ $$avolume$$bnc$$2rdacarrier
000026019 4901_ $$aWorld Trademark Review,$$x1751-0627 ;$$vGB 100 Aug/Sepages 2009 No 20, pages 76-80
000026019 500__ $$aAmong the top 10 cases of the year selected by the Chinese People's Supreme Court, five were of key significance to trademark owners. The selection criteria left many puzzled, but a new analysis shows that each decision is remarkable in its own way. [Source: WTR].
000026019 650_0 $$aTrademarks (International law)
000026019 650_0 $$aTrademarks.
000026019 650_0 $$aTrademarks$$zChina.
000026019 650_4 $$aCase law
000026019 650_4 $$aTrademark law$$zChina
000026019 651_0 $$aChina$$xCommerce$$xLaw and legislation.
000026019 7001_ $$aSmith, T.
000026019 7001_ $$aHao, L.
000026019 830_0 $$aWorld Trademark Review ;$$vGB 100 Aug/Sepages 2009 No 20, pages 76-80.
000026019 903__ $$aWorld Trademark Review.
000026019 904__ $$aJournal article
000026019 942__ $$cART$$jGB 100 Aug/Sep 2009 No 20$$2ddc
000026019 952__ $$w2010-08-04$$p2010-0713$$u40210$$bMAIN$$10$$kGB 100 $$v2010-08-04$$70$$cMain library$$yART
000026019 980__ $$aBIB
000026019 999__ $$c28403$$d28403