000025850 000__ 01749cam\a2200445\i\4500
000025850 001__ 25850
000025850 003__ SzGeWIPO
000025850 005__ 20240708162159.0
000025850 008__ 100617s2010    xx |||||r|||| 00| 0 dan d
000025850 035__ $$a(wipo)0
000025850 035__ $$a(OCoLC)1160231757
000025850 040__ $$aSzGeWIPO$$beng$$erda$$cSzGeWIPO$$dCaBNVSL
000025850 043__ $$ae------
000025850 050_4 $$aK1565$$b.W674
000025850 08204 $$a346.048805$$222
000025850 084__ $$aGB 100 
000025850 1001_ $$aBailey, Sarah.,$$eauthor.
000025850 24510 $$aDelivering clarification /$$cS. Bailey et al.
000025850 264_1 $$a[Place of publication not identified] :$$b[publisher not identified],$$c2010.
000025850 300__ $$a1 volume ([3] pages) ;$$c[28] cm.
000025850 336__ $$atext$$btxt$$2rdacontent
000025850 337__ $$aunmediated$$bn$$2rdamedia
000025850 338__ $$avolume$$bnc$$2rdacarrier
000025850 4901_ $$aWorld Trademark Review,$$x1751-0627 ;$$vFebruary/March 2010, No 23, pages 37-39
000025850 500__ $$aWhile it may seem logical for Community trademark owners to expect pan-European remedies where infringement is established in one member state, the reality is somewhat different. A recent dispute over express shipping could lead to some much needed clarity on this issue.
000025850 650_0 $$aTrademarks (International law)
000025850 650_0 $$aTrademark infringement$$zEurope.
000025850 650_0 $$aTrademarks$$zEurope.
000025850 650_4 $$aInfringement
000025850 650_4 $$aTrademarks$$zEurope
000025850 651_0 $$aEurope$$xCommerce$$xLaw and legislation.
000025850 7001_ $$aMclean, Angus.
000025850 7001_ $$aMenon, Rohan.
000025850 7001_ $$aKamp, Laurens.
000025850 7001_ $$aEmsinghoff, Eva-Maria.
000025850 830_0 $$aWorld Trademark Review ;$$vFebruary/March 2010, No 23, pages 37-39.
000025850 903__ $$aWorld Trademark Review.
000025850 904__ $$aJournal article
000025850 942__ $$cART$$2ddc
000025850 952__ $$w2010-06-17$$p2010-0502$$u39997$$bMAIN$$10$$kGB 100 $$v2010-06-17$$zLibrary$$71$$cLibrary
000025850 980__ $$aBIB
000025850 999__ $$c28218$$d28218