000025589 000__ 01304cam\a2200457\i\4500
000025589 001__ 25589
000025589 003__ SzGeWIPO
000025589 005__ 20240708162143.0
000025589 008__ 071126s2009    enk|||||r|||| 00| 0 eng d
000025589 035__ $$a(wipo)0
000025589 035__ $$a(OCoLC)1158229761
000025589 040__ $$aSzGeWIPO$$beng$$erda$$cSzGeWIPO$$dCaBNVSL
000025589 041__ $$aeng
000025589 043__ $$an-cn---
000025589 050_4 $$aK1501.2$$b.P38
000025589 08204 $$a346.0486$$220
000025589 084__ $$aGB 53
000025589 1001_ $$aBartholomew, A.,$$eauthor.
000025589 24510 $$aAPOTEX V SANOFI SYNTHELABO CANADA :$$bSupreme Court of Canada's decision on obviousness, novelty and selection invention/s /$$cGarland, S., Lainson, D.
000025589 264_1 $$aLondon [England] :$$bInforma Law,$$c2009.
000025589 300__ $$a1 volume ([4] pages) ;$$c[28] cm.
000025589 336__ $$atext$$btxt$$2rdacontent
000025589 337__ $$aunmediated$$bn$$2rdamedia
000025589 338__ $$avolume$$bnc$$2rdacarrier
000025589 4901_ $$aPatent World,$$x0950-2513 ;$$vGB 53 Apr 2009 No 211, pages 12-15
000025589 650_0 $$aComputer software$$vPatents.
000025589 650_0 $$aPatents.
000025589 650_0 $$aPatent laws and legislation.
000025589 650_0 $$aBiotechnology industries$$vPatents.
000025589 650_0 $$aIntellectual property.
000025589 650_0 $$aTrademarks$$xLaw and legislation.
000025589 650_0 $$aPatents$$zCanada.
000025589 650_4 $$aNovelty
000025589 650_4 $$aCase law$$zCanada
000025589 651_0 $$aCanada$$xCommerce$$xLaw and legislation.
000025589 7001_ $$aLainson, D.
000025589 830_0 $$aPatent World ;$$vGB 53 Apr 2009 No 211, pages 12-15.
000025589 903__ $$aPatent World.
000025589 904__ $$aJournal article
000025589 942__ $$cART$$jGB 53 Apr 2009 No 211$$2ddc
000025589 952__ $$w2010-01-20$$p2010-0113$$u39607$$bMAIN$$10$$kGB 53$$v2010-01-20$$70$$cMain Library$$yART
000025589 980__ $$aBIB
000025589 999__ $$c27952$$d27952