000025519 000__ 01220cam\a2200373\i\4500 000025519 001__ 25519 000025519 003__ SzGeWIPO 000025519 005__ 20240708162137.0 000025519 008__ 071205s2009 enk|||||r|||| 00| 0 eng d 000025519 035__ $$a(wipo)0 000025519 035__ $$a(OCoLC)1159510887 000025519 040__ $$aSzGeWIPO$$beng$$erda$$cSzGeWIPO$$dCaBNVSL 000025519 041__ $$aeng 000025519 050_4 $$aK1401.A15$$bJ675 000025519 08204 $$a346.048$$222 000025519 084__ $$aGB 137 000025519 1001_ $$aRodinger, P. 000025519 24510 $$aCommunity design invalidity :$$bthe issues, as viewed through the case law. 000025519 264_1 $$aOxford [England] :$$bOxford University Press,$$c2009. 000025519 300__ $$a1 volume ([14] pages) ;$$c[28] cm. 000025519 336__ $$atext$$btxt$$2rdacontent 000025519 337__ $$aunmediated$$bn$$2rdamedia 000025519 338__ $$avolume$$bnc$$2rdacarrier 000025519 4901_ $$aJournal Of Intellectual Property Law & Practice,$$x1747-1532 ;$$vGB 137 Sepages 2009 Vol 4 No 9, pages 629-642 000025519 650_0 $$aIntangible property. 000025519 650_0 $$aIntellectual property. 000025519 650_4 $$aOffice for Harmonization in the Internal Market (OHIM) 000025519 650_4 $$aCommunity designs 000025519 830_0 $$aJournal Of Intellectual Property Law & Practice ;$$vGB 137 Sepages 2009 Vol 4 No 9, pages 629-642. 000025519 8564_ $$uhttp://jiplp.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/reprint/4/9/629$$y[For WIPO staff only] 000025519 903__ $$aJournal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice. 000025519 904__ $$aJournal article 000025519 942__ $$cART$$jGB 137 Sep 2009 Vol 4 No 9$$2ddc 000025519 952__ $$w2010-01-07$$p2010-0015$$u39509$$bMAIN$$10$$kGB 137$$v2010-01-07$$70$$cMain Library$$yART 000025519 980__ $$aBIB 000025519 999__ $$c27879$$d27879