Having explored multifaceted issues of IPR enforcement, this text argues that IPR enforcement problem is not an actual outcome of Confucian philosophy and 'to steal a book' is not an 'elegant offence'.
Note
Revision of the author's thesis (Ph. D)--University of Cambridge, 2006. Humanities, Social Science and Law (Springer-11648). Having explored multifaceted issues of IPR enforcement, this text argues that IPR enforcement problem is not an actual outcome of Confucian philosophy and 'to steal a book' is not an 'elegant offence'.
Bibliography, etc. Note
Includes bibliographical references (pages 295-314) and index.
Formatted Contents Note
1. Introduction; 2. The justification for IPR protection; 3. China's response to the multilateral context of TRIPs; 4. Cultural perplexity in intellectual property: how to undo the gordian knot; 5. EU-China interaction in normative integration; 6. Harmony or coercion? EU-China trade relations and IPR; 7. Conclusion.