000025443 000__ 02705cam\a22005295i\4500
000025443 001__ 25443
000025443 003__ SzGeWIPO
000025443 005__ 20230424151003.0
000025443 008__ 080923s2009\\\\ilu\\\\\rb\\\\001\0\eng\d
000025443 010__ $$a200804
000025443 020__ $$a9780226080611
000025443 020__ $$z9780226080635$$qelectronic book
000025443 020__ $$z0226080633$$qelectronic book
000025443 020__ $$z0226080617$$qcloth
000025443 020__ $$z1282239449
000025443 020__ $$z9781282239449
000025443 035__ $$a(wipo)578349973
000025443 035__ $$a(OCoLC)255016280
000025443 040__ $$aGyGoGBV$$beng$$erda$$cSzGeWIPO$$dCaBNVSL
000025443 0410_ $$aeng
000025443 043__ $$an-us---
000025443 050_0 $$aKF3114
000025443 08204 $$a346.730486$$222
000025443 084__ $$aG 16 BUR.P
000025443 084__ $$a2$$2ssgn
000025443 090__ $$c27798$$d27788
000025443 1001_ $$aBurk, Dan L.,$$eauthor.
000025443 24514 $$aThe patent crisis and how the courts can solve it /$$cDan L. Burk and Mark A. Lemley.
000025443 264_1 $$aChicago :$$bUniversity of Chicago Press,$$c2009.
000025443 300__ $$aviii, 220 pages. ; :$$bx ;$$c24 cm. :
000025443 336__ $$atext$$btxt$$2rdacontent
000025443 337__ $$aunmediated$$bn$$2rdamedia
000025443 338__ $$avolume$$bnc$$2rdacarrier
000025443 500__ $$aIncludes bibliographical references (pages 171-209) and index.
000025443 504__ $$aIncludes bibliographical references (pages 171-209) and index.
000025443 5050_ $$a1. The gathering storn; 2. Foundations of the patent system; 3. Cracks in the foundation; 4. The diversity of innovation; 5. The industry-specific nature of the patent system; 6. Heterogeneity in patent theory: why we can't agree why we patent; 7. Parts of the elephant: how industry perspective drives patent theory; 8. Why courts and not congress offer a way out ot the crisis; 9. Policy levers in existing patent cases; 10. More we can do: Potential new policy levers; 11. Levers in a specific industry-biotechnology; 12. Levers at work-the IT industry.
000025443 520__ $$aPatent law is crucial to encourage technological innovation. But as the patent system currently stands, diverse industries from pharmaceuticals to software to semiconductors are all governed by the same rules even though they innovate very differently. The result is a crisis in the patent system, where patents calibrated to the needs of prescription drugs wreak havoc on information technologies and vice versa. According to Dan L. Burk and Mark A. Lemley in The Patent Crisis and How the Courts Can Solve It, courts should use the tools the patent system already gives them to treat patents in dif.
000025443 650_0 $$aPatents$$zUnited States.
000025443 650_0 $$aPatent laws and legislation$$zUnited States.
000025443 650_6 $$aBrevets d'invention$$xDroit$$zÉtats-Unis.
000025443 651_0 $$aUnited States$$xCommerce$$xLaw and legislation.
000025443 7001_ $$aLemley, Mark A.,$$d1966-
000025443 7001_ $$aBurk, Dan L.
000025443 85641 $$ahttps://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226080635.001.0001$$yView eBook
000025443 942__ $$cMON$$jG 16 BUR.P
000025443 952__ $$w2009-10-16$$p2009-0820$$r35.96$$u39369$$bMAIN$$10$$kG 16 BUR.P$$v2009-10-16$$ztagged$$71
000025443 952__ $$w2009-10-16$$p2009-0821$$r35.96$$u39370$$bMAIN$$10$$kG 16 BUR.P$$v2009-10-16$$ztagged$$71
000025443 980__ $$aBIB
000025443 999__ $$c27798$$d27798