000024802 000__ 01518cam\a2200421\i\4500 000024802 001__ 24802 000024802 003__ SzGeWIPO 000024802 005__ 20240708162104.0 000024802 008__ 071015s2008 enk|||||r|||| 00| 0 eng d 000024802 035__ $$a(wipo)0 000024802 035__ $$a(OCoLC)1161645960 000024802 040__ $$aSzGeWIPO$$beng$$erda$$cSzGeWIPO$$dCaBNVSL 000024802 041__ $$aeng 000024802 050_4 $$aK5$$b.U72 000024802 08204 $$a346.4048$$220 000024802 084__ $$a10$$qGB 000024802 1001_ $$aSims, Alexandra.,$$eauthor. 000024802 24514 $$aThe denial of copyright protection on public policy grounds /$$cAlexandra Sims. 000024802 264_1 $$aLondon, England :$$bSweet & Maxwell,$$c2008. 000024802 300__ $$a1 volume ([9] pages) ;$$c[28] cm. 000024802 336__ $$atext$$btxt$$2rdacontent 000024802 337__ $$aunmediated$$bn$$2rdamedia 000024802 338__ $$avolume$$bnc$$2rdacarrier 000024802 4901_ $$aEuropean Intellectual Property Review (EIPR),$$x0142-0461 ;$$v2008, Vol. 30, No. 5, pages 189-198 000024802 500__ $$aThe courts have denied copyright protection to fraudulent, immoral or obscene works because it offended public policy to protect such works. Despite arguments that immorality and illegality play no part in determining what copyright protects, this article argues for the continued existence of a public policy ground upon which copyright protection can be denied outright to works or remedies refused. 000024802 650_0 $$aIntellectual property$$zEurope. 000024802 650_0 $$aIntellectual property. 000024802 650_0 $$aCopyright. 000024802 650_4 $$aCopyright 000024802 650_4 $$aPublic policy 000024802 650_6 $$aPropriété intellectuelle$$zEurope. 000024802 830_0 $$aEuropean Intellectual Property Review (EIPR) ;$$v2008, Vol. 30, No. 5, pages 189-198. 000024802 903__ $$aEuropean Intellectual Property Review (EIPR). 000024802 904__ $$aJournal article 000024802 942__ $$cART$$2ddc 000024802 952__ $$w2009-01-19$$p2009-0034$$u38575$$bMAIN$$10$$kGB 10$$v2009-01-19$$zLibrary$$71$$cLibrary 000024802 980__ $$aBIB 000024802 999__ $$c27108$$d27108