@article{24800,
      note = {This article critically examines the arguments put forward  in favour of a term extension of related rights of  phonogram producers. The authors conclude that there are no  convincing reasons to extend the existing term of  protection. This article also explains why the popular  argument that a term extension would improve the situation  of performers is probably a fallacy.},
      author = {Helberger, Natali., and Dufft, Nicole. and Van Gompel,  Stef. and Hugenholtz, Bern.},
      url = {http://tind.wipo.int/record/24800},
      title = {Never forever : why extending the term of protection for  sound recordings is a bad idea /},
      recid = {24800},
      pages = {1 volume ([7] pages) ;},
}