000024775 000__ 01325cam\a2200409\i\4500
000024775 001__ 24775
000024775 003__ SzGeWIPO
000024775 005__ 20240708162103.0
000024775 008__ 071015s2008    enk|||||r|||| 00| 0 eng d
000024775 035__ $$a(wipo)0
000024775 035__ $$a(OCoLC)1159546480
000024775 040__ $$aSzGeWIPO$$beng$$erda$$cSzGeWIPO$$dCaBNVSL
000024775 041__ $$aeng
000024775 050_4 $$aK5$$b.U72
000024775 08204 $$a346.4048$$220
000024775 084__ $$aGB 10
000024775 1001_ $$aReeskamp, Paul.,$$eauthor.
000024775 24510 $$aIs comparative advertising a trade mark issue? /$$cPaul Reeskamp.
000024775 264_1 $$aLondon, England :$$bSweet & Maxwell,$$c2008.
000024775 300__ $$a1 volume ([7] pages) ;$$c[28] cm.
000024775 336__ $$atext$$btxt$$2rdacontent
000024775 337__ $$aunmediated$$bn$$2rdamedia
000024775 338__ $$avolume$$bnc$$2rdacarrier
000024775 4901_ $$aEuropean Intellectual Property Review (EIPR),$$x0142-0461 ;$$v2008, Vol. 30, No. 4, pages 130-137
000024775 500__ $$aComparative advertising: trade mark use v wrongful act. Is comparative advertising a trade mark issue? To what extent does the use of another's trade mark constitute 'use' of a trade mark under the European Trade Mark Directive or a wrongful act?
000024775 650_0 $$aIntellectual property$$zEurope.
000024775 650_0 $$aIntellectual property.
000024775 650_4 $$aInfringement
000024775 650_4 $$aTrademarks
000024775 650_6 $$aPropriété intellectuelle$$zEurope.
000024775 830_0 $$aEuropean Intellectual Property Review (EIPR) ;$$v2008, Vol. 30, No. 4, pages 130-137.
000024775 903__ $$aEuropean Intellectual Property Review (EIPR).
000024775 904__ $$aJournal article
000024775 942__ $$cART$$2ddc
000024775 952__ $$w2008-12-30$$p2008-0873$$u38537$$bMAIN$$10$$kGB 10$$v2008-12-30$$zLibrary$$71$$cLibrary
000024775 980__ $$aBIB
000024775 999__ $$c27079$$d27079