000024775 000__ 01325cam\a2200409\i\4500 000024775 001__ 24775 000024775 003__ SzGeWIPO 000024775 005__ 20240708162103.0 000024775 008__ 071015s2008 enk|||||r|||| 00| 0 eng d 000024775 035__ $$a(wipo)0 000024775 035__ $$a(OCoLC)1159546480 000024775 040__ $$aSzGeWIPO$$beng$$erda$$cSzGeWIPO$$dCaBNVSL 000024775 041__ $$aeng 000024775 050_4 $$aK5$$b.U72 000024775 08204 $$a346.4048$$220 000024775 084__ $$aGB 10 000024775 1001_ $$aReeskamp, Paul.,$$eauthor. 000024775 24510 $$aIs comparative advertising a trade mark issue? /$$cPaul Reeskamp. 000024775 264_1 $$aLondon, England :$$bSweet & Maxwell,$$c2008. 000024775 300__ $$a1 volume ([7] pages) ;$$c[28] cm. 000024775 336__ $$atext$$btxt$$2rdacontent 000024775 337__ $$aunmediated$$bn$$2rdamedia 000024775 338__ $$avolume$$bnc$$2rdacarrier 000024775 4901_ $$aEuropean Intellectual Property Review (EIPR),$$x0142-0461 ;$$v2008, Vol. 30, No. 4, pages 130-137 000024775 500__ $$aComparative advertising: trade mark use v wrongful act. Is comparative advertising a trade mark issue? To what extent does the use of another's trade mark constitute 'use' of a trade mark under the European Trade Mark Directive or a wrongful act? 000024775 650_0 $$aIntellectual property$$zEurope. 000024775 650_0 $$aIntellectual property. 000024775 650_4 $$aInfringement 000024775 650_4 $$aTrademarks 000024775 650_6 $$aPropriété intellectuelle$$zEurope. 000024775 830_0 $$aEuropean Intellectual Property Review (EIPR) ;$$v2008, Vol. 30, No. 4, pages 130-137. 000024775 903__ $$aEuropean Intellectual Property Review (EIPR). 000024775 904__ $$aJournal article 000024775 942__ $$cART$$2ddc 000024775 952__ $$w2008-12-30$$p2008-0873$$u38537$$bMAIN$$10$$kGB 10$$v2008-12-30$$zLibrary$$71$$cLibrary 000024775 980__ $$aBIB 000024775 999__ $$c27079$$d27079