000024720 000__ 01731cam\a2200421\i\4500
000024720 001__ 24720
000024720 003__ SzGeWIPO
000024720 005__ 20240708162101.0
000024720 008__ 080201s2008    enk|||||r|||| 00| 0 eng d
000024720 035__ $$a(wipo)0
000024720 035__ $$a(OCoLC)1160611506
000024720 040__ $$aSzGeWIPO$$beng$$erda$$cSzGeWIPO$$dCaBNVSL
000024720 043__ $$an-us---
000024720 050_4 $$aK9$$b.N7477
000024720 08204 $$a346.04805$$219
000024720 084__ $$aGB 72 
000024720 1001_ $$aMcdermott, Eileen.,$$eauthor.
000024720 24510 $$aHow Quanta will change licensing /$$cEileen McDermott.
000024720 264_1 $$aLondon [England] :$$bEuromoney Institutional Investor PLC,$$c2008.
000024720 300__ $$a1 volume ([4] pages) ;$$c[28] cm.
000024720 336__ $$atext$$btxt$$2rdacontent
000024720 337__ $$aunmediated$$bn$$2rdamedia
000024720 338__ $$avolume$$bnc$$2rdacarrier
000024720 4901_ $$aManaging Intellectual Property,$$x0824-7064 ;$$vJuly/August 2008, No 181, pages 74-78
000024720 500__ $$aThe Supreme Court's decision in Quanta v LG clarified US law on the doctrine of patent exhaustion, potentially making it harder for licensors to collect downstream royalties. This article explores the implications of the case.
000024720 650_0 $$aIntellectual property$$zCanada.
000024720 650_0 $$aCopyright.
000024720 650_0 $$aIntellectual property$$zUnited States.
000024720 650_0 $$aPatents$$zUnited States.
000024720 650_4 $$aPatent exhaustion$$zUnited States of America
000024720 650_6 $$aPropriété intellectuelle.
000024720 651_0 $$aAmerica$$xCommerce$$xLaw and legislation.
000024720 651_0 $$aUnited States$$xCommerce$$xLaw and legislation.
000024720 830_0 $$aManaging Intellectual Property ;$$vJuly/August 2008, No 181, pages 74-78.
000024720 903__ $$aManaging Intellectual Property.
000024720 904__ $$aJournal article
000024720 942__ $$cART$$2ddc
000024720 952__ $$w2008-11-18$$p2008-0803$$u38468$$bMAIN$$10$$kGB 72$$v2008-11-18$$zLibrary$$71$$cLibrary
000024720 980__ $$aBIB
000024720 999__ $$c27023$$d27023