000024370 000__ 01407cam\a2200445\i\4500
000024370 001__ 24370
000024370 003__ SzGeWIPO
000024370 005__ 20240708162235.0
000024370 008__ 071126s2008    enk|||||r|||| 00| 0 eng d
000024370 035__ $$a(wipo)0
000024370 035__ $$a(OCoLC)1159569258
000024370 040__ $$aSzGeWIPO$$beng$$erda$$cSzGeWIPO$$dCaBNVSL
000024370 041__ $$aeng
000024370 050_4 $$aK1501.2$$b.P38
000024370 08204 $$a346.0486$$220
000024370 084__ $$aGB 53 Jul/Aug 2008 No 204
000024370 090__ $$c26642$$d26637
000024370 1001_ $$aMontaèan,̀ Miquel,$$eauthor.
000024370 24510 $$aWhen similar might be the same :$$blandmark decision sheds light on equivalents and prosecution history estoppel /$$cMiquel Montaèan ̀and Isabel Carulla.
000024370 264_1 $$aLondon [England] :$$bInforma Law,$$c2008.
000024370 300__ $$a1 volume ([4] pages) ;$$c[28] cm.
000024370 336__ $$atext$$btxt$$2rdacontent
000024370 337__ $$aunmediated$$bn$$2rdamedia
000024370 338__ $$avolume$$bnc$$2rdacarrier
000024370 4901_ $$aPatent World,$$x0950-2513 ;$$vJuly/August 2008, No 204, pages 24-28
000024370 500__ $$aArticle discusses the history of equivalents and estoppel, and considers how the recent Count of Appeal decision impacts case law in Spain.
000024370 650_0 $$aPatent laws and legislation.
000024370 650_0 $$aPatents.
000024370 650_0 $$aIntellectual property.
000024370 650_0 $$aComputer software$$vPatents.
000024370 650_0 $$aBiotechnology industries$$vPatents.
000024370 650_0 $$aTrademarks$$xLaw and legislation.
000024370 650_4 $$aPatent law$$zSpain
000024370 650_4 $$aInfringement
000024370 7001_ $$aCarulla, Isabel.
000024370 830_0 $$aPatent World ;$$vJuly/August 2008, No 204, pages 24-28.
000024370 903__ $$aPatent World.
000024370 904__ $$aJournal article
000024370 942__ $$cART
000024370 952__ $$w2008-06-09$$p2008-0388$$u38036$$bMAIN$$10$$kGB 53 Jul/Aug 2008 No 204$$v2008-06-09$$71$$cLibrary$$yART
000024370 980__ $$aBIB
000024370 999__ $$c26642$$d26642