000024039 000__ 03326cam\a2200601\i\4500
000024039 001__ 24039
000024039 003__ SzGeWIPO
000024039 005__ 20210318104936.0
000024039 008__ 071203s2007    enk|||||rb||| 001 0 eng d
000024039 020__ $$a9780521868396
000024039 020__ $$z0521868394$$qhardback
000024039 020__ $$z0511366361
000024039 020__ $$z9780511366369
000024039 020__ $$z0511495269
000024039 020__ $$z9780511495267
000024039 020__ $$z0521329620
000024039 020__ $$z9780521329620
000024039 020__ $$z9780511366994$$qelectronic book
000024039 020__ $$z9780511367588$$qelectronic book
000024039 035__ $$a(wipo)0
000024039 035__ $$a(OCoLC)1161671500
000024039 040__ $$aSzGeWIPO$$beng$$erda$$cSzGeWIPO$$dCaBNVSL
000024039 043__ $$ae------
000024039 050_4 $$aKJE2725$$b.L45 2007
000024039 050_4 $$aKJC2751$$b.C66 2007x
000024039 08204 $$a346.240486$$222
000024039 08204 $$a346.2404862222$$222
000024039 084__ $$aG 272 LEI.S
000024039 1001_ $$aLeith, Philip,$$d1954-$$eauthor.
000024039 24510 $$aSoftware and patents in Europe /$$cPhilip Leith.
000024039 264_1 $$aCambridge, UK :$$bCambridge University Press,$$c[2007]
000024039 300__ $$aviii, 203 pages :$$billustrations ;$$c[28] cm.
000024039 336__ $$atext$$btxt$$2rdacontent
000024039 337__ $$aunmediated$$bn$$2rdamedia
000024039 338__ $$avolume$$bnc$$2rdacarrier
000024039 4901_ $$aCambridge intellectual property and information law
000024039 504__ $$aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
000024039 5050_ $$a1. Software as machine, 2. Software as software, 3. Policy arguments, 4. Software patent examination, 5. Holding the line : algorithms, business methods and other computing ogres, 6. The third way : between patent and copyright? 7. Conclusion : dealing with and harmonising "radical" technologies.
000024039 5201_ $$a"The computer program exclusion from Article 52 of the European Patent Convention (EPC) proved impossible to uphold as industry moved over to digital technology, and the Boards of Appeal of the European Patent Organisation (EPO) felt emboldened to circumvent the EPC in Vicom by creating the legal fiction of 'technical effect'. This 'engineer's solution' emphasised that protection should be available for a device, a situation which has led to software and business methods being protected throughout Europe when the form of application, rather than the substance, is acceptable. Since the Article 52 exclusion has effectively vanished, it is timely to reconsider what makes examination of software invention difficult and what leads to such energetic opposition to protecting inventive activity in the software field, Leith advocates a more programming-centre approach, which recognises that software examination requires different strategies from that of other technical fields."--Jacket.
000024039 650_0 $$aComputer software$$zEuropean Union countries$$xPatents.
000024039 650_0 $$aPatent laws and legislation$$zEuropean Union countries.
000024039 650_0 $$aPatents$$zEurope.
000024039 650_0 $$aCopyright$$zEurope.
000024039 650_0 $$aIntellectual property$$zEurope.
000024039 650_6 $$aBrevets d'invention$$xDroit$$zPays de l'Union européenne.
000024039 650_6 $$aLogiciels.
000024039 650_6 $$aLogiciels$$zPays de l'Union européenne$$xBrevets d'invention.
000024039 651_0 $$aEurope$$xCommerce$$xLaw and legislation.
000024039 7001_ $$aLeith, Philip,$$d1954-
000024039 830_0 $$aCambridge intellectual property and information law.
000024039 942__ $$cMON$$2ddc
000024039 952__ $$w2007-12-03$$p2007-0698$$r60.00$$u37605$$bMAIN$$10$$kG 272 LEI.S$$v2007-12-03$$ztagged$$71
000024039 980__ $$aBIB
000024039 999__ $$c26291$$d26291