000023273 000__ 01798cam\a22003735i\4500
000023273 001__ 23273
000023273 003__ SzGeWIPO
000023273 005__ 20240708161928.0
000023273 008__ 990803s1999\\\\cau\\\\\r\\\\u000\0\eng\d
000023273 035__ $$a(wipo)(CD )99-1523
000023273 035__ $$a(OCoLC)1159476887
000023273 040__ $$aSzGeWIPO$$beng$$erda$$cSzGeWIPO$$dCaBNVSL
000023273 043__ $$ae-uk---
000023273 084__ $$a76$$qGB
000023273 1001_ $$aHaftke, Mark,$$eauthor.
000023273 24510 $$aPro Sieben Media AG v. Carlton UK Television Ltd and Twenty-Twenty Vision Ltd /$$cMark Haftke.
000023273 264_1 $$aLos Angeles, California :$$bUCLA School of Law,$$c1999.
000023273 300__ $$a1 volume ([4] pages) ;$$c[28] cm.
000023273 336__ $$atext$$btxt$$2rdacontent
000023273 337__ $$aunmediated$$bn$$2rdamedia
000023273 338__ $$avolume$$bnc$$2rdacarrier
000023273 4901_ $$aEntertainment Law Review ;$$v1999 Vol 10 No 4 pages 118-122
000023273 500__ $$a"In reversing the decision of Laddie J. at first instance, the Court of Appeal has sought to clarify the defence of "fair dealing" under section 30(1) of the Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1998. The author considers the implications to both the scope of the defence and to the test to be applied, and whether the law has actually been clarified or not."
000023273 650_0 $$aCopyright$$zUnited Kingdom.
000023273 650_0 $$aPatents$$zUnited Kingdom.
000023273 650_4 $$aCOPYRIGHT : BERNE CONVENTION, PROTECTED PERSONS AND OBJECTS : FAIR DEALING : UNITED KINGDOM
000023273 650_4 $$aCOPYRIGHT DESIGNS AND PATENTS ACT 1998 : SECTION 30(1) : UNITED KINGDOM
000023273 650_4 $$aFAIR DEALING : CASES : UNITED KINGDOM
000023273 651_0 $$aUnited Kingdom$$xCommerce$$xLaw and legislation.
000023273 830_0 $$aEntertainment Law Review ;$$v1999 Vol 10 No 4 pages 118-122.
000023273 903__ $$v1$$aENTERTAINMENT LAW REVIEW
000023273 904__ $$aJournal article
000023273 942__ $$cART$$2ddc
000023273 952__ $$w2006-11-03$$p1999-1523$$r0.00$$u36555$$bMAIN$$10$$kGB 76$$v1999-08-03$$zLibrary$$70
000023273 980__ $$aBIB
000023273 999__ $$c25431$$d25431