\(
\def\WIPO{World Intellectual Property Organisation}
\)
Sharing biomedical research resources : Principles and guidelines for recipients of NIH research grants and contracts : Race horse or trojan horse? : Proposed restrictions on the commercialisation of "research tools" by the National Institutes of Health / Thomas D. Mays.
2000
110 GB
Available at WIPO Library
Formats
Format | |
---|---|
BibTeX | |
MARCXML | |
TextMARC | |
MARC | |
DataCite | |
DublinCore | |
EndNote | |
NLM | |
RefWorks | |
RIS |
Items
Details
Title
Sharing biomedical research resources : Principles and guidelines for recipients of NIH research grants and contracts : Race horse or trojan horse? : Proposed restrictions on the commercialisation of "research tools" by the National Institutes of Health / Thomas D. Mays.
Author
Item Type
Journal article
Description
1 volume ([10] pages) ; [28] cm.
Alternate Call Number
110 GB
Summary
"In view of concerns in the biomedical research community, the National Institutes of Health proposed a set of agency principles as well as operational guidelines encouraging recipients of NIH funding to more effectively promote the wider distribution of research materials or 'tools' without the restrictions imposed through the patenting and exclusive licensing of these materials. In December 1999, the NIH issued its Final Notice, which articulates the agency's funding policies relating to the commercialisation of research results and materials. These revisions to its previous proposal demonstrate that NIH is taking cautious steps to promote research, while attempting to respect the competing concerns of the bio-medical research and commercialisation communities. NIH may need to pay particular attention to the potentially adverse consequences that an aggressive implementation of this policy may have on small businesses that commercialise 'research tools' that arise from NIH funding. Whether NIH's policy will promote research or chill private investment in new biotechnology research should be very closely evaluated".
Series
Series
Bio-Science Law Review ; 1999/2000 No 2 pages 56-66.
Published
[Place of publication not identified] : [publisher not identified], 2000.
Language
English
Record Appears in