000012143 000__ 01840cam\a22003375i\4500
000012143 001__ 12143
000012143 003__ SzGeWIPO
000012143 005__ 20210318092527.0
000012143 008__ 000417s2000\\\\xx\\\\\\r\\\\u000\0\eng\d
000012143 035__ $$a(wipo)(CD )00-0412
000012143 035__ $$a(OCoLC)1160219203
000012143 040__ $$aSzGeWIPO$$beng$$erda$$cSzGeWIPO$$dCaBNVSL
000012143 084__ $$a110$$qGB
000012143 1001_ $$aDrahos, Peter,$$eauthor.
000012143 24510 $$aGenetically modified organisms and biosafety :$$bthe global regulatory issues /$$cPeter Drahos.
000012143 264_1 $$a[Place of publication not identified] :$$b[publisher not identified],$$c2000.
000012143 300__ $$a1 volume ([10] pages) ;$$c[28] cm.
000012143 336__ $$atext$$btxt$$2rdacontent
000012143 337__ $$aunmediated$$bn$$2rdamedia
000012143 338__ $$avolume$$bnc$$2rdacarrier
000012143 4901_ $$aBio-Science Law Review ;$$v1999/2000 No 2 pages 40-50
000012143 520__ $$a"The article describes the model of self-regulation that emerged for biosafety after Asilomar and looks at the impact of World Trade Organisation rules on biosafety issues. The article identifies a group of core regulatory principles for GMOs and provides an argument for how these principles should be ranked. A key conclusion is that the regulation of GMOs should be driven by a principle of best practice risk assessment and that the precautionary principle and the principle of substantial equivalence should drop out of the regulatory picture".
000012143 650_0 $$aPatents.
000012143 650_4 $$aPATENTS : PATENTABILITY : HORTICULTURAL AND FOOD PRODUCTS (FOR ANIMALS AND HUMAN BEINGS)
000012143 650_4 $$aGENETICALLY MODIFIED ORGANISMS (GMOS) : REGULATORY ISSUES
000012143 650_4 $$aBIOSAFETY : GLOBAL REGULATION, WTO
000012143 830_0 $$aBio-Science Law Review ;$$v1999/2000 No 2 pages 40-50.
000012143 903__ $$v1$$aBIO-SCIENCE LAW REVIEW
000012143 942__ $$cART$$2ddc
000012143 952__ $$w2006-11-03$$p2000-00-0412$$r0.00$$u12631$$bMAIN$$10$$kGB 110$$v2000-04-17$$zMISSING$$70
000012143 980__ $$aBIB
000012143 999__ $$c12477$$d12477